United Nations System
Standing Committee on Nutrition



 

SCN Working Group on Nutrition and HIV/AIDS

held during the ACC/SCN's 29th Session in Berlin, Germany, March 2002

Chair: Badara Samb (WHO)
Rapporteur: Marti van Liere (KIT)

While the role of nutrition in HIV/AIDS prevention, care and mitigation is now better understood, there remains a large gap between commitment and action. The main objective of this session was to add impetus to this emerging nutrition agenda and highlight the opportunities for relevant action.

Jos Perriens' (WHO) presentation dealt with the minimum care and support package, which includes nutritional care and counselling. For some of these elements there is no guidance on how to scale up. Several actions such as strategic partnerships have led to significant decreases in the price of ARVs. In relation to drug use (especially PI, one of the nucleosides) metabolic abnormalities draw increasing concerns: hyperlipemia, hyperglycemia, lipodystrophy. The HIV/AIDS department in WHO does not yet discuss the relation between HIV and nutrition. During the discussion the point was made that drugs alone is not a sufficient response, and hunger is a growing concern.

Dan Raiten (NIH) put forward the role of diet/nutrition in HIV and issues that would require special consideration above and beyond provision of food. He raised many outstanding questions, which showed how many gaps persist. Instead of becoming discouraged by this list it should be seen as a guiding framework to prioritize and start doing some of this work. The issues mentioned varied from the relationship between nutritional status and the natural history of HIV/AIDS, to impact of malnutrition on drug efficacy, interaction between ARVs and micronutrient deficiencies, nutritional requirements of HIV infected infants for growth, effect of HIV or ARV drugs on lactation. He strongly recommended the coordination of studies in this field with standardized protocols and methodologies that will enable meta-analysis. We have sufficient evidence on the relationship between infections and nutrition to warrant more resources for research on the specific inter-relationship between nutrition and HIV.

Andrew Tomkins (Institute of Child Health) then discussed nutrition among children and distinguished between those infected with HIV/AIDS, and those affected because the mother was HIV positive or because both parents were sick or dead. He showed that nutritional care in a hospital environment makes a difference to children with HIV. Median survival was 31 months after diagnosis and many of them even survive to go to school. For the micronutrients: vitamin A seems to have an effect on intestinal mucosa in HIV+ children, and beneficial effects on diarrhoea and pneumonia were found in three African populations. However there is no evidence for zinc, selenium or vitamin E and nothing on multi-micronutrient supplementation. Most HIV+ mothers produce small, premature infants of which 75% are HIV-. Low birthweight does not seem to differ between HIV+ and HIV- mothers, but when it does this is related to the nutritional status of the mother. A recommendation here would be to put a strong emphasis on improving maternal nutritional status both in terms of weight and micronutrient status. For infants whose parents are both sick or dead, the conceptual framework is quite broad and includes growth, cognition, physical activity, sensory capacity, immunity, resilience, personal peace. The strategies adopted in this case are traditional such as orphanages, food distribution, financial support for foster families, income generating activities. Often good initiatives are community-based and the question is how to scale up without losing quality?

Maren Lieberum (independent consultant) presented a short overview of the several initiatives dealing with nutritional care and support for people living with HIV/AIDS of several UN agencies including nutritional guidelines, training course, and a guide on providing food aid.

Stuart Gillespie (IFPRI) focused on the livelihoods perspective in the relationship between nutrition security and HIV/AIDS. He posed two questions: a) how should policies and programs be altered to reduce risk to HIV exposure and infection and increase resilience to HIV/AIDS, and b) is it "more and faster" or should it be different? An "HIV lens" was proposed to facilitate the assessment of HIV/AIDS impacts and interactions with nutrition insecurity, to mainstream HIV responses in different relevant sectors, and to anticipate both short- and long-term consequences. He recommended priority attention be given to communication and information sharing, understanding the location-specific dynamics of household and community response to HIV/AIDS including the main determinants of risk and resilience, highlighting options for effectively using food aid to strengthen local capacity and increase livelihood opportunities, the need to learn how best to preserve social capital, how to mainstream the use of the HIV-lens, and how to scale up community responses.

Recommendations and action plan

  • A consultative meeting should be organized to review and compare all initiatives dealing with nutritional care and support. The meeting should include all stakeholders especially community-based organizations. This meeting should be convened by the SCN.
  • The new chair of the working group should approach Nutritionnet (www.nutritionnet.net) to open up an information sharing forum on nutrition and HIV/AIDS and permit day-to-day dialogue between those active and concerned with these issues.
  • The SCN chair should write to Peter Piot and heads of HIV/AIDS departments in UN agencies of the commitments to nutrition and HIV/AIDS shown last year and summarized in the SCN Statement. These letters should identify several interventions that have proven to work.
  • The working group should elaborate a conceptual framework for research priorities; this framework should be used in consultative meetings.
  • The Secretariat should consider bringing together the various presentations made on March 14 in Berlin and publishing these along with short summaries from other presenters, possibly in SCN News.
  • The new chair of this working group should discuss with other working group chairs, well in advance of the 30th session in Chennai, how to incorporate HIV/AIDS into working group agendas with a view to harmonizing coverage.