|
|
|
Nutrition Information in Crisis Situations - Kenya
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Food Security1Food consumption Sources of food Sources of income Food distribution Water sources 1According to household interviews; first figures refer to
North-Eastern Turkana, |
From the OXFAM survey in Turkana district:
Following a poor short-rainy season in parts of Kenya, the delay in the onset of the long-rains season is a cause of concern (FEWS, 14/04/05). A significant number of districts are considered as being in the alert phase regarding food security. The drought-affected pastoral and marginal agricultural areas are the most at risk. Moreover, inter-clan clashes have been reported in Turkana, West Pokor, Garissa, Marsabit and Mandera districts (IRIN, 16/03/05, FEWS, 14/04/05). Food distributions have been disrupted in March due to logistical problems (FEWS, 14/04/05).
Beside weather hazards, the problem of chronic poverty seems to be also related to minorities' issues in some districts. A report highlights that some minorities are the frequent victims of development policies (MRG, 13/04/05). For example, the total development budget for the district of Turkana, which is one of the poorest districts in Kenya and is regularly hard hit by drought, was less than one sixth of the budget for the relatively prosperous Nyeri district, in 2004-2005. The report warns that excluding minorities from development can result in conflict.
Wajir and Mandera districts are part of the arid lands. They are mainly populated by Somali ethnic pastoralists. The areas suffer political, social and economic marginalisation and have poor infrastructure and very limited employment opportunities. They were also hard hit by the drought which began in 2003. Random-sampled nutrition surveys were conducted in the worst affected areas of the districts: Wajir South and Wajir West in October 2004 (OXFAM, 10/04), and Mandera Central and Khalalio divisions in Mandera district in March 2005 (AAH-US, 03/05). The surveys revealed very high rates of acute malnutrition while crude mortality rates were under control (table 2). The under-five mortality rate was above alert threshold in Wajir West. When compared with the results of nutrition surveys carried out in September 2001, the nutrition situation in Wajir South seems to have remained stable while it has significantly worsened in the Western zone. A food distribution is implemented in the district, targeting 22% of the households. This is clearly not enough to guarantee an adequate nutritional status.
Table 2 Results of surveys in Mandera and Wajir districts, North-Eastern province, Kenya (OXFAM, 10/04; AAH-US, 03/05)
In Mandera district, the comparison with previous surveys conducted in Mandera Central division showed that the nutrition situation is within the same range as in March 2002, but has significantly deteriorated when compared to March 2001. Despite the implementation of a targeted food distribution and of supplementary and therapeutic feeding programmes, the nutrition situation is still highly precarious.
From the Oxfam nutrition survey in Wajir:
Contrary to expectations before the onset of the short rainy season, rains were poor in the marginal agricultural districts in Eastern, Coast and Central provinces, which has led to maize crop failure (FEWS, 06/01/05). The expected short rainy season harvest of maize has been revised to 270,000 MTs instead of the 450,000 MTs which was originally expected (FEWS, 20/01/05). The long and short rain harvests are estimated at 2 million MTs instead of the 2.61 million MTs average of the10 previous years (FEWS, 20/01/05). Poor short rains have also badly affected the agro-pastoral district of Kajiado (FEWS, 20/01/05). Pastoral districts of Marsabit and western Mandera have experienced water shortages and fatal clashes over water have been reported in Mandera district and the Mai Mahiu region (FEWS, 20/01/05; AFP, 24/01/05). In other pastoral areas, food security seemed to have improved (FEWS, 20/01/05).
Food distribution to the 26 drought-affected districts improved in December 2004: 2.2 million people received food aid compared to 1.3 million in November. The ration also improved in quantity and quality (FEWS, 06/01/05).
Nutrition situation not critical in Kitui district, Eastern Region and Taita Taveta district, Coastal region
Random-sampled surveys conducted in two southern districts (mostly agro-pastoral), which have been declared affected by the drought, showed acceptable prevalence of acute malnutrition (table 6) (AMREF, 10/04; IMC, 10/04). However, the poor last rainy season may worsen the situation. Mortality was under control in Kitui district.
Table 6 Results of surveys in Kitui district, Eastern province and in Taita Taveta district, Eastern province, Kenya, October 2004 (AMREF, 10/04; IMC, 10/04)
| % Acute Malnutrition** (95% CI) |
% Severe Acute Malnutrition** (95% CI) |
Measles immunisation coverage (%)* |
Vitamin A distribution |
Crude Mortality (/10,000/day) |
Under 5 Mortality (/10,000/day) |
| Kitui District | |||||
| 4.5 (3.3-5.5) | 0.4 (0.1-1.9) | 90.8 | 78.2 | 0.71 | 1.04 |
| Wundanyi & Mwanbirwa divisions, Taita Taweta district | |||||
| 3.0 (1.7-4.1) | 0.4 (0.0-1.0) | 89.0 | 74.4 | - | - |
| Voi & Toita divisions, Taita Taweta district | |||||
| 4.9 (3.0-6.0) | 0.7 (0.2-1.6) | 88.2 | 44.5 | - | - |
* According to cards or mothers' statements
** Not including oedematous children
Precarious nutrition situation in Kakuma refugee camp and Kakuma town, Turkana district
Kakuma refugee camp was set up in 1992 and hosts mostly Sudanese refugees (about 75%), Somali refugees (about 14%) and a small number of people from the Great Lakes. In October 2004, the camp was hosting about 90,000 people.
Turkana district is classified as an “arid and semi-arid land” and is mostly pastoral.
This area is chronically food insecure with a significant reduction in herds over the past few years. The most recent droughts were experienced in 1999-2002 and in late 2003-2004 (see NICS 2).
Two random-sampled nutrition surveys were conducted in Kakuma refugee camp and among resident populations around Kakuma town in October 2004 (IRC, 10/04).
According to the surveys, the nutrition situation was serious and mortality rates were high (table 7). The nutrition status of resident and refugee children were comparable, while mortality rates seemed higher among the resident population than among the refugees.
Comparison with previous surveys showed that the nutrition situation in Kakuma camp was within the same range as in late 2003 (figure 1).
Figure 1 Prevalence of acute malnutrition, Kakuma refugee camp

A survey conducted in February 2004 in Kakuma, Lokichoggio and Oropoi divisions in Turkana district revealed a prevalence of malnutrition of 16.8% (14.5-19.4) (see NICS 2). Although this survey and the survey carried out in October 2004 are not directly comparable, because they were not conducted among the same population, the results of both surveys are within the same range.
Haemoglobin measurements among refugee and resident children showed that anaemia was a major public health problem in both resident and refugee populations (table 8).
Almost all refugee households were getting relief food (98.4%) while 30.7% of the resident households had access to food distributions. More than half of the refugees (58.9%) were selling part of the food distribution to buy items such as milk, meat, vegetables, cloths, soap or firewood.
Only about 35% of the refugee and resident mothers were exclusively breast-feeding their children until the age of 6 months.
Table 7 Results of surveys in Kakuma refugee camp and Kakuma town, Turkana district, Kenya, October 2004 (IRC, 10/04)
| % Acute Malnutrition (95% CI) |
% Severe Acute Malnutrition (95% CI) |
Measles immunisation coverage (%)* |
Vitamin A distribution |
Crude Mortality (/10,000/day) |
Under 5 Mortality (/10,000/day) |
| Kakuma camp | |||||
| 18.4 (14.9-22.1) | 2.6 (1.7-4.1) | 85.8 | 86.4 | 0.86 | 2.27 |
| Resident population | |||||
| 18.8 (14.7-24.0) | 2.8 (1.6-4.6) | 86.5 | 86.0 | 1.55 | 3.02 |
* According to cards
Table 8 Prevalence of anaemia, Kakuma refugee camp and Kakuma town, Turkana district, Kenya, October 2004 (IRC, 10/04)
| N | Mild anaemia*(%) (95% CI) |
Moderate anaemia*(%) (95% CI) |
Severe anaemia*(%) (95% CI) |
Total anaemia*(%) |
| Refugee Children | ||||
| 231 | 59.3 (52.7-65.7) | 23.1 (16.1-27.1) | 2.6 (1.0-5.6) | 85.0 |
| Resident Children | ||||
| 103 | 68.0 (58.0-76.8) | 6.8 (2.8-13.5) | 1.9 (0.2-6.8) | 76.7 |
*Mild anaemia: Hb = 7-11 g/dl; moderate anaemia: Hb = 5-7 g/dl; severe anaemia: Hb < 5 g/dl
Average nutrition situation in Dadaab refugee camps, Garissa district
A random-sampled nutrition survey was conducted in June 2004 in Dadaab refugee camp (GTZ, 06/04). At the time of the survey, the three camps located in Dadaab area (Hagadera, Dagahaley and Ifo) were hosting 134,784 people, mainly from Somalia. Unfortunately, the prevalence of acute malnutrition was only expressed as a percentage of the median. The prevalence of acute malnutrition was 6.9% (5.3-8.6), including 0.2% (0.1-0.6) severe acute malnutrition. Comparison with the prevalence of malnutrition, also expressed as a percentage of the median, from previous surveys showed an improvement compared to 2003 when acute malnutrition was 15.1% (12.2-17.9), including 2.2% (1.3-3.1) severe acute malnutrition.
Anaemia (Hb < 11 g/dl) was high among the 6-59 month-olds: Hagadera: 54.3%, Ifo: 61.2% and Dagahaley: 60.9%. It was, however, lower than in Kakuma (see above).
The food distribution seemed to have been near the intended 2,100 Kcal/pers/day over the six months prior to the survey, with an average distribution of 2072 Kcal/pers/day. About half of the households were selling part of their food ration and especially cereal, mainly in order to buy other food such as sugar, milk, meat, tea leaves, rice and vegetables, or soap and paraffin.
More than half of the households (56.1%) reported having some kind of income and/or property. Forty-two percent of the households owned livestock, while 27% had incomes: about 20% had some kind of waged labour or income-generating activities, 4% had their own business and another 4% were receiving remittances.
It seemed that fewer families who reported having incomes were selling part of their food ration (29%) than families who reported not having incomes (60%).
This might be explained by the fact that for families who do not have an income, selling part of the food ration is the only way to obtain other food or non-food items.
Tsunami
While the Tsunami hit the Kenyan coast at the end of December 2004, it seemed that the early evacuation of the beaches and coastal areas prevented major casualties. A few wounded people and one death were reported (Afrol News, 03/01/05). Mombasa city and nearby villages seemed to have been badly hit.
Overall
Food security is still poor in pastoral and agro-pastoral areas hit by drought. The nutrition situation of both refugee and resident population in Kakuma division, Turkana district is precarious (category II), while it seemed to have somewhat improved in Dadaab refugee camps.
The short rainy season started earlier than usual and was expected to be good in agricultural areas. This will improve the situation in the drought-affected agricultural areas from the harvest expected in February 2005. On the other hand, drought was expected to continue in parts of Turkana, Marsabit, Isiolo and Laikipia districts (FEWS, 07/10/04). An assessment conducted early October in pastoral areas showed that the situation was still serious (FEWS, 28/10/04).
The August-January Kenya emergency operation was only 60% resourced as of October 2004 and it was anticipated that while cereal needs will be met, shortfalls of pulses and blended food will remain (FEWS, 07/10/04, WFP, 29/10/04).
WFP has experienced food shortfalls and delivery problems for Dadaab refugee camps; the food rations distributed have been lower than intended (WFP, 29/10/2004).
Investigation of the outbreak of aflatoxin intoxication in eastern and central regions, which peaked between April and July 2004 (see NICS 3), revealed aflatoxin concentrations above tolerated threshold (> 20 ppb) in about half of the food samples collected from households and markets, with some samples showing concentrations as high as 8,000 ppb (MMWR, 04/09/04). The government of Kenya provided replacement food in the most affected districts and people have been advised to avoid eating food suspected to be mouldy.
Garissa district is one of the 26 districts declared affected by drought in 2004. The district has also been included in the 12 districts selected by the Health and Nutrition sector group for interventions. A random-sampled nutrition survey was conducted in September 2004 in the pastoral area of the district (UNICEF/MOH, 09/04). The prevalence of acute malnutrition revealed a precarious situation with 16.5% (14.3-18.8) of the children surveyed being acutely malnourished, including 3.5% (2.6-4.8) severely malnourished. 11.8% of the mothers were classified energy deficient (MUAC < 22 cm). About 64% of the children had received measles immunisation and only 43% of the children had received vitamin A during the year prior to the survey. Mortality rates were average: CMR = 0.46 pers/10,000/day and under-five mortality rate = 1.1 pers/10,000/day. The food security situation was estimated poor.
According to two nutrition surveys conducted in Wajid West and Wajid South in October 2004, the situation was critical: the prevalence of acute malnutrition was 31.5%, including 3.5% severe acute malnutrition, and 22.4%, including 2.3% severe malnutrition, in Wajir West and Wajir South, respectively (FEWS, 11/11/04).
Mandera district has been highly affected by the current drought. This district is also chronically food insecure, at least since the major drought in 1991-92 when pastoralists, the predominant group in this area, lost most of their livestock. A rapid assessment conducted in Mandera Central, Takaba, Kotulo, Lafey and Wargadud divisions in August 2004 (AAH-UK, 08/04), showed a situation of concern: 28.6% of the children ( 12-59 months) measured were at risk of malnutrition (MUAC ≥ 12 cm and < 13.5 cm), while 1.9% and 0.7% were moderately (MUAC < 12 cm and ≥ 11 cm) and severely (< 11 cm) malnourished, respectively. Scarcity of water has reached a critical level in some divisions.
Drought emergency declared in 26 districts
The president of Kenya declared the current drought a "national disaster" and appealed for relief food assistance (AFP, 14/07/04). Early cessation of rains in May has led to the wilting of crops and insufficient replenishment of pastures. Twenty-six of the 71 districts of Kenya are affected (UNICEF, 03/08/04) and 1.8 million people are considered in need of food aid, as well as 500,000 school children in addition to the one million school children already benefiting from school feeding programmes (KFSSG, 14/07/04).
The most vulnerable households are found in Eastern province, Coastal province and in pastoral areas (KFSSG, 14/07/04). Grain prices have risen and terms of trade have worsened for pastoralists. People have begun to engage in coping mechanisms.
Should the next rainy season be poor, an additional one million people would be in need of food aid (KFSSG, 14/07/04).
A drought relief EMOP prepared by WFP was approved at the beginning of August 2004 (WFP, 06/08/04). In addition, a flash consolidated inter-agency appeal was launched. The appeal covers the period of August 2004 to February 2005 and includes food aid, health and nutrition, water and sanitation, education, agriculture and livestock, and coordination and support services (OCHA, 10/08/04).
In five districts of the eastern region, aflatoxin (a toxin created by mould on grains) contamination of maize grains has led to more than 100 deaths (KFSSG, 14/07/04). Testing of grains for aflatoxin and destruction of contaminated stocks are under-way.
Following assessments showing high food insecurity and appalling rates of malnutrition, food distribution and nutrition programmes have been implemented in Turkana and Marsabit districts and seemed to have mitigated the poor situation (FEWS, 06/07/04).
According to the KFSSG assessment:
In addition, the following needs were identified and more information and analysis is required:
Serious food security and nutrition situation in Turkana and Marsabit districts
Turkana and Marsabit districts are classified as “arid and semi-arid lands” and are amongst the driest and least productive in Kenya.
This area is chronically food insecure with a significant reduction in herds over the years. The last years of drought in 1999-2002 further weakened the livelihoods of this mostly pastoral population. The October-December short rains were poor in Marsabit district and poorly distributed in Turkana district, which prevented the pastures in the worst affected areas from being replenished. Moreover, increased insecurity in Turkana district, such as cattle raiding, has further exacerbated the poor situation. The condition of livestock was reported as deteriorating, the price of livestock was very low and the terms of trade were unfavourable to pastoralists (FEWS, 19/03/04). However, good rains in April may have mitigated the situation (FEWS, 06/05/04).
Several nutrition surveys recently carried out in these districts showed high rates of acute malnutrition, ranging from 18% to 34% (FEWS, 05/04/04).
About 230,000 persons (40% of the population) will benefit from food aid from April to July 2004, at a 50% ration (FEWS, 05/04/04).
An appalling nutrition situation was found in the northeastern zone of Turkana district during a random-sampled nutrition survey conducted in February 2004 (OXFAM, 02/04). The prevalence of acute malnutrition was 34.4% (31.3-37.4), including 5.4% (4.0-7.0) severe acute malnutrition, and has dramatically increased within the last two years. The rate of malnutrition was around ten percent in 2001 and 2002 and was about 28% in March 2003. Different factors, such as the poor rains in 2002-2003, the halt in the food distribution programme at the end of 2002 and the overall destitution of households over the years, may explain the deterioration of the nutrition situation. Mortality rates were also high: CMR=2.1 /10,000/day and <5MR=2.6 /10000/day.
A significant proportion of pregnant and lactating women (42%) had a MUAC < 23 cm.
Vitamin A distribution coverage was low and measles vaccination coverage was average (table 8).
Table 8 Measles vaccination and vitamin A distribution coverage, Northern Turkana district, Kenya, February 2004 (OXFAM, 02/04)
| Measles vaccination coverage (%)* |
Vitamin A distribution coverage within the last 6 months (%) |
| Eastern zone of Turkana district | |
| 83.3 | 45.4 |
| Western zone of Turkana district | |
| 66 | 38.6 |
The number of meals has significantly decreased compared to "normal times" (table 9). It is worth noting that 20% of the families reported having no meal the day prior to the survey, indicating a very worrying situation.
Table 9 Number of meals taken, North-eastern Turkana district, Kenya, February 2004 (OXFAM, 02/04)
| Number of meals the day prior to the survey |
Normal times | At the time of the survey |
| No meals | 0 | 19 |
| 1 meal | 20 | 65 |
| 2 meals | 35 | 6 |
| 3 meals | 45 | 10 |
The main livelihoods of households were pastoralism (64%), fishing (11%) and handicrafts (10%).
The traditional sources of income (from livestock or fishing) were limited by the bad condition of livestock and its low price, and by the high cost of inputs for the use of boats. People tended to shift to coping strategies such as an increase in petty trading.
As of May 2004, emergency general food distributions and food for work programmes were on-going and the implementation of treatment of severe malnutrition was planned.
A survey done at the same time as in the eastern part of Turkana district (see above), showed a precarious situation but which had not deteriorated since 2003 (OXFAM, 02/04). The prevalence of acute malnutrition was 16.8% (14.5-19.4) including 1.8% (1.1-2.9) severe acute malnutrition in February 2004, 18.9% in March 2003 and 11.4% in February 2002. The same factors as for the eastern part of the district may explain the deterioration of the nutrition situation compared to 2002. Mortality rates were also lower than in the eastern part of the district; CMR and <5 MR were respectively 1.5 /10,000/day and 1.2 /10,000/day. Measles vaccination and vitamin A coverage were low (table 8).
Most of the population was pastoralist or urban/semi-urban. The number of meals has decreased when compared to "normal times" but to a lesser extent than in the eastern zone.
The proportion of income from livestock has decreased in both groups whilst the proportion of income from petty trade has increased. The sale of wild food has also widely decreased, which may be due to scarcity or an increase in consumption.
The Kakuma refugee camp, hosting about 80,000 people and the humanitarian Operation Life Line Sudan headquarters are situated in this area. It is thought that the activities and trade opportunities they offer, may partly explain why the nutrition situation has deteriorated less than in the eastern part.
Kakuma refugee camp was set up in 1992 and hosts mostly Sudanese refugees (about 60%), Somali refugees (about 35%) and a small number of people from the Great Lakes. In December 2003, the camp was hosting about 87,000 people. Although the movement of the refugees and the employment opportunities outside the camps are restricted, some refugees manage to get incomes. The better-off also receive remittances from abroad. The poorest refugees are those who can not secure regular and significant incomes (35-45% of the refugees). Most of the refugees are highly dependant on international aid. The relation with the local population is tense and riots occur regularly.
The refugees are meant to receive a full food distribution (2,168 Kcal/pers/day), but the ration actually distributed is often lower due to frequent pipeline breaks. The distribution of CSB, which should supplement the ration in micro-nutrients is often reduced or omitted.
The nutrition situation is regularly followed with an annual nutrition survey. The situation has remained above acceptable levels for years (figure 3). The last nutrition survey carried out in December 2003 showed a significant deterioration of the situation compared to 2002 (figure 3) (IRC, 12/03).
Figure 3 Acute malnutrition, Kakuma camp, Turkana district, Kenya
During this survey, the haemoglobin status of 270 children aged 6-59 months was measured. Results showed appalling rates of anaemia (table 10), which have worsened when compared to the results of April 2001 when already 61.3% of the children were considered anaemic (Hb<11 g/dL). At the time the survey was written, the measurement of haemoglobin was repeated in order to verify these high rates of haemoglobin deficiency.
The measles vaccination and vitamin A distribution coverage, according to cards and mothers’ statement was 74.3% and 40.4%, respectively.
A small percentage of the families (about 2%) seemed not to be registered for the general food distribution.
Around 55% of the mothers interviewed during the survey reported having received counselling on breast-feeding. Some 62% of the mothers said they know that mothers can transmit HIV to their children.
The nutrition situation of the refugees seems to be comparable with that of the host population in the same regional zone (see above).
The insufficiency of aid provided may partly explain the rise in malnutrition. Although interactions between refugees and the host population are restricted, interactions exist and the actual food insecurity faced by the host population may also have some implications for the refugees.
Table 10 Anaemia among 6-59 month olds, Kakuma refugee camp, December 2003
| Mild anaemia (%) (Hb 7-11 g/dL) |
Moderate anaemia (%) (Hb 5-7 g/dL) |
Severe anaemia (%) (Hb < 5 g/dL) |
Total anaemia (%) (Hb <11 g/dL) |
| 76.5 | 14.7 | 3.3 | 94.5 |
Turkana district is chronically food insecure and households' livelihoods have been eroded over the years. In some areas such as the northeast, coping mechanisms are limited and the food security and nutrition situation has worsened within the past two years (category I); the prevalence of acute malnutrition has increased threefold between 2001-2002 and 2003-2004. In the northwest part of the district, the situation has also worsened but to a lesser extent (category II). The nutrition situation in Kakuma refugee camp is above acceptable levels (category II).
From the OXFAM survey in the Turkana district:
Eastern zone:
Eastern and western zones:
From the IRC survey in Kakuma:
Refugee camps in Dadaab
The three refugee camps, Ifo, Daghaley and Hagadera, located around Dadaab town in Garissa district, were established in 1991 and 1992. The camps host about 130,000 refugees, mainly from Somalia.
A random sampled nutrition survey was carried out in the three camps in June 2003 (MSF-B, 06/03). The prevalence of acute malnutrition was 23.9% (20.0-27.7) including 3.7% (2.5- 4.9) severe acute malnutrition. The prevalence of malnutrition has remained high since 1997 and has increased significantly since last year (see graph). A retrospective mortality survey was also carried out. The results showed a high under-five mortality rate (2.1/10,000/day), whilst crude mortality rate remained undercontrol (0.5/10,000/day). These results were not in accordance with the results of the mortality routine surveillance, which showed lower mortality rates.
Prevalence of acute malnutrition, Dadaab refugee camps, Kenya
Household food security seems to be precarious, with the majority of the refugees having few income opportunities (see box). The main constraints to income opportunities are arid environment, government policy which restricts freedom of movement and lack of employment opportunities. Moreover, at the beginning of 2003, food distributions were lower than the intended full food ration, as recorded by food basket monitoring (GTZ, 08/03) (see graph).
Household food security and public health environment, Dadaab camps
| Household food security Food distribution Intended full ration distributions (2,100 Kcal) But, irregular distributions (see graph) Sources of food Access to wild food, livestock or agriculture is negligible Sources of income Sale of food aid to diversify the diet and buy essential non food items Wealth groups Rich: traders owning cereal grinding meals; 5-15% of the population Better-off: traders and incentive workers; 10-15% of the population Middle: small traders; 15% of the population Less poor: daily workers; 15-20% of the population Poor: no access to regular income; 35-45% of the population Assets Distribution of firewood, but the distribution is constrained by funding shortfalls Public health Health care In each camp: 3 health posts, 1 hospital, reference to Garissa hospital, community health workers No outbreak reported Nutrition care Therapeutic and supplementary feeding programmes, for children under-five, pregnant and lactating women |
Food distribution, Dadaab refugee camps, Kenya, 2003 (GTZ, 08/03)
Overall - Malnutrition rates are unacceptably high in Dadaab camps (category II). Refugees, and especially the poorest are highly dependent on external aid. Donors should ensure that adequate food rations and basic items are regularly provided to the refugees.
The two huge refugee camp areas have been affected over these past months. In Dadaab area, 3,000 of the 130,000 refugees hosted in three camps were homeless after floods devastated their homes (AFP, 07/05/03). In Kakuma refugee camps, a riot between Sudanese refugees and Turkana people, native to the area, has resulted in 12 deaths; 30,000 Sudanese refugees had temporarily fled their shelters (OCHA, 22/07/03). The violence emerged after a cattle-rustling incident. Rivalries between the Turkana people and refugees, comes partly because of the destitution of both communities, which are struggling to survive in the hard environment of this dry-hot area (OCHA, 22/07/03). Food aid rations have been restored to their intended level (full ration), from a previously 75% ration in March 2003 (WFP, 08/08/03).
Kenya hosts more than 200,000 refugees mostly from Sudan and Somalia. The majority of the refugees are settled in huge camps in dry-hot areas. They are prevented from moving freely outside of the camps and are not allowed to own cattle, cultivate land or work. Most of the refugees are therefore almost totally reliant on external aid. The humanitarian assistance to the refugees has been under-funded for years; food and non-food item (such as wood) distributions have not been sufficient to cover all the refugee needs. The prevalence of acute malnutrition has been above the acceptable range over the past years (see RNIS 40). The new government of Kenya is willing to review the encampment policy and to take different measures to increase refugee self-sufficiency (Reuters, 17/02/03). The government was examining the possibility of re-locating the camps to areas where people will be able to cultivate land, and to authorize people to work. The improvement of the refugee status will be a great advance for their well -being.
Refugees
Kenya hosts some 200,000 refugees, mostly from Sudan and Somalia. Kakuma camp is located in Turkana district, north-western Kenya, near the Sudan border and three camps are located in Garissa district, east Kenya, near the Somalia border.
Kakuma camp
The camp was established in 1992 for Sudanese refugees fleeing conflict in the Upper Nile. In 1998, Kakuma II was opened, primarily to accommodate Somali refugees who were transferred from camps in Mombassa, which were closed. In 1999, Kakuma III was opened for more Sudanese fleeing from the war.
In September 2002, the population of Kakuma camp was estimated at around 66,000, of which 80.5% were Sudanese, 15% Somali, 3% Ethiopian and the rest from the Great Lakes region.
Refugees experience harsh living conditions and face many constraints: they are settled in a dry-hot area, they are prevented from moving freely out of the camp, and the resident population is hostile to them as they see them as competitor for scarce resources. These factors have made the majority of the refugees almost totally reli- ant on relief aid, although some are able to access income-generating activities.
A nutritional survey was carried out by IRC in Kakuma refugee camp in September 2002 (IRC/ UNHCR/LWF, 09/02). About 2% of the households interviewed were Burundian, 4% were Ethiopian, 15 % were Somali and the majority (79%) was from Sudan. The survey revealed that 14.3 % of the children surveyed were acutely malnourished, including 1.3 % severely malnourished; 0.4 % of the children had oedema. However, when expressed as percentage of the median, the acute malnutri- tion rate fell to 6.3%, including 0.1% severe malnu- trition, which is not considered to be critical. The discrepancy may be partly explained by the fact that a significant number of children were border- line cases (with a weight-height index slightly lower than -2 Z-scores) and therefore were classified as malnourished when Z-score was used but not when percentage of the median was used.
Levels of acute malnutrition have remained stable, between 14% and 19%, since 1997 (see graph).
Acute malnutrition, Kakuma refugee camp
Food aid appeared to be the main source of food. According to the survey results, about 50% of the refugees consumed only food from the general distribution (the day prior to the survey), about 25% of the refugees ate food from the general distribution together with food from other sources, 20% consumed food borrowed or given by relatives and 5% consumed only food purchased from the market.
These results seem to be in line with a food security assessment done in September 1999. According to this assessment, the poor group (35-45% of the refugees) has very little access to incomes. The less poor group (15-20%) is able to get some incentives from small business. The middle incentive group (30-40%) and the better-off (15%) are comprised of traders and higher incentive earners, as well as those who receive remittances. They often support a wide range of people.
Food distribution is scheduled on a bi-monthly basis and is intended to be a full ration of 2,100 Kcal/pers/day. However, the amounts of food distributed have been irregular and were equivalent on average to 1,960 Kcal/pers/day in 2000, 1,730 Kcal/pers/day in 2001 and 1,670 Kcal/pers/day in 2002 (see graph). During the first half of 2002, the average Corn Soya Blend (CSB) distribution, which is intended to supplement the ration in micro-nutrients, was 17 g/pers/day instead of the planned 40 g/pers/day. For the poorest who can not access incomes, the food ration is not only the main source of food but also a significant way to get cash to buy basic items such as firewood or soap, when they are not provided in sufficient quantity by relief agencies. Measles vaccination coverage was good with 50.8% coverage confirmed by card and 91.9% when also taking mothers' statements into account. About 80% of the children surveyed received vitamin A. Most of the families got water from taps, but hygiene practices seemed inadequate, as well as the children's feeding practices.
The average prevalence of malnutrition observed in the camp may be related to multi-sectoral causes, such as inadequate food and non-food item distribution to the poorest, and poor hygiene and feeding practices. The funding shortfall that UNHCR is currently facing may further undermine refugee living conditions. UNHCR will be obliged to reduce to a third the amount of firewood which was distributed to refugees, who will need to sell part of their food ration to buy wood, or to risk being beaten or raped when collecting wood in surrounding private land (UNHCR, 14/11/02).
Dadaab camps
The three refugee camps around Dadaab town in Garissa district; Ifo, Dagahaley and Hagadera, were established in 1991 and 1992 following an influx of refugees fleeing fighting in the middle/ lower Juba and Gedo regions of Somalia. In June 2002, the population was estimated at around 130,000 refugees; about 37,000 in Dagahaley, 48,000 in Hagadera and 45,000 in Ifo. MSF-B undertook a nutrition survey in Dadaab camps in June 2002 (MSF-B, 06/02). The prevalence of acute malnutrition among 6-59 month-old children was 15.0 %, including 2.1% severe malnutrition; 1.2 % of the children had oedema. Malnutrition rates have remained high since 1997 (see graph). The amount of food distributed has not been more regular in Dadaab camps than in Kakuma camp. The average of food distributed was 1900 Kcal/kg/day in 2000 and fell to 1800 Kcal/pers/ day in 2001 and 2002 (see graph).
Acute malnutrition, Dadaab camps
Food distribution, Kakuma refugee camp (WFP Kenya, 11/02)
Food distribution, Dadaab refugee camps (WFP Kenya, 11/02)
Overall - The current nutrition situation of the refugees in Kenya can not be considered acceptable (category II/III). Refugees, especially the poorest, are highly dependent on external aid. The funding shortfall UNHCR is currently facing, as well as the food shortfall WFP is expecting from February , may worsen the situation.
Recommendations and priorities
From the IRC survey in Kakuma camp
From the MSF-B survey in Dadaab camps
|
Kenya Le Kenya abrite environ 200 000 réfugiés, essentiellement originaires du Soudan et de Somalie. Le camp de Kakuma, situé dans le district du Turkana, au nord-ouest du Kenya, regroupe environ 66 000 réfugiés; la plupart des autres réfugiés sont installés dans trois camps près de la ville de Dadaab, dans le district de Garissa, à l'est du pays. Une enquête nutritionnelle réalisée dans le camp de Kakuma, en septembre 2002, a montré un taux de malnutrition aiguë de 14,3%, incluant 1.3% de malnutrition sévère. Les taux de malnutrition sont restés stables dans ce camp depuis 1997 (voir graphique). Bien que certains réfugiés parviennent à obtenir des revenus, la plupart sont très dépendants de l'aide humanitaire, ne pouvant ni sortir librement du camp ni cultiver la terre aride de cette région. L'aide alimentaire représente la seule source de nourriture pour la moitié des réfugiés. La distribution d'aide alimentaire par le PAM a été en moyenne de 1670 Kcal/pers/jour en 2002, c'est à dire inférieure à la ration de 2100 Kcal/pers/jour qui était prévue. Le taux de malnutrition observé dans le camp peut être dû à différents facteurs, comme la dis- tribution insuffisante d'aide alimentaire et non-alimentaire aux plus pauvres, ou des pratiques inadéquates quant à l'hygiène et à l'alimentation des jeunes enfants. Une enquête nutritionnelle réalisée dans les camps près de Dadaab en août 2002, a montré que 15% des enfants souffraient de malnutrition aiguë, dont 2.1% de malnutrition sévère. Là encore, la situation nutritionnelle est restée stable depuis 1997 et la distribution alimentaire a été en moyenne de 1800 Kcal/pers/jour en 2002, inférieure aux 2100 Kcal/pers/jour recommandées. La situation nutritionnelle dans les camps de réfugiés au Kenya n'est pas satisfaisante (catégorie II/III), et pourrait se détériorer à la suite de défauts de financement du UNHCR et du PAM. La plupart des réfugiés étant fortement dépendants de l'aide humanitaire, et en particulier les plus pauvres, il est essentiel que celle-ci soit dispensée en qualité et en quantité suffisantes. |
Refugees
More than 200,000 refugees, mostly from Somalia and Sudan are still located in two huge camps: Dadaab and Kakuma. For a number of reasons, including restricted movement from the camps and environmental hostility, the refugees rely totally on food aid distribution. High rates of malnutrition and micronutrient deficiencies have been reported for years as documented by RNIS. This is mostly attributed to inadequate food rations both in quantity and quality, because of a shortage in the food pipeline. This has led IRC recently to raise the issue of Kakuma camp before the US senate (IRC, 06/02). Distribution of non-food items was also reported to be inadequate leading refugees to sell food to buy wood for cooking, for example. IRC was also concerned about the decrease in donor contribution to the management of the camp. The IRC testimony has perhaps had an impact: WFP have reported that due to additional donations, they will be able to provide almost full rations to refugees until January 2003. However, more food is needed for the period January-June 2003. A joint assessment mission is planed by UNHCR, WFP, Government of Kenya and potential donors at the end of September 2002 (WFP, 30/08/02).
There have been reports of increased tension and antipathy towards the refugee community. In the districts where Kakuma and Dadaab camps are located and as elections are approaching, some politicians are using the case against the refugees as part of their electoral campaign (JRS, 31/07/02). Also, some forced repatriation of Somali refugees from Mandera has been reported. (OCHA, 18-07-02).
Drought affected population
Having begun in March 2000, the Kenya drought relief EMOP is now being phased out, following an assessment mission which reported a significant improvement in the food security of the affected population. However, some pastoral and agro-pastoral areas in Eastern province are still in need of some form of relief intervention (WFP, 09/08/02). A final general food distribution took place mid-September. The food for work programme will be on-going until the food pipeline is depleted (WFP, 30/08/02).
Flood affected population
About 50 people were killed and 150,000 displaced by floods occurring in May (Xinhua, 13/05/02). The most affected provinces were Nyanza, Coast, Western and North Eastern provinces. This was followed by an outbreak of malaria in the Nyanza and Rift Valley province claiming over 500 lives in June and July (IFRC, 28/08/02). Food and non-food items have been provided by the Kenyan Red Cross Society.
Overall The nutrition situation of refugees in Kenya is still of concern (category II).
Recommendations and priorities
From the RNIS
|
Kenya Le Kenya accueille toujours plus de 200 000 réfugiés dans deux principaux camps, Dadaab et Kakuma. Pour différentes raisons comme la restriction de leur mouvement à lextérieur des camps et la rudesse de lenvironnement, ces réfugiés sont totalement dépendants de laide alimentaire. Leur situation nutritionnelle est inadéquate depuis de nombreuses années; ceci est en particulier attribué a linsuffisance de laide apportée à ces populations. Cette situation a conduit lONG IRC à alerter le congrès américain à propos des conditions de vie précaires de ces populations. Il semble que cela ait eu un certain impact, le PAM ayant reçu de nouvelles donations et ayant réussi à augmenter les rations alimentaires. Ces réfugiés sont néanmoins toujours considérés à risque (catégorie II). Le soutien à ces populations en terme de nourriture et de matériel de base doit continuer et être amélioré. Le programme du PAM en faveur des populations kenyanes
affectées par la sécheresse est en cours darrêt, la
situation de ces populations sétant améliorée.
Certaines provinces de lEst auront néanmoins toujours besoin de
support. 150,000 personnes ont été déplacées au mois
de mai à la suite dinondations, en particulier dans louest et
le nord-est du pays. |
The current humanitarian situation in Kenya has seen improvements over the past couple of years, although the frequency of drought and the presence of inter ethnic fighting has left many areas of the country acutely food insecure and vulnerable to further crises. The food security prospects appear relatively good in most arable areas of the countryand the areas of greatest concern remain the northern pastoralist regions, particularly Mandera and Turkana, where rates of malnutrition are reported to be particularly high.
The humanitarian response is suffering from budgetary constraints, which continue to threaten the food pipeline, and reductions in food rations have been reported. WFP have announced that there is a food deficit of 5,000 MT until the end of 2002 (WFP 24/05/02) and there is an urgent need for new pledges to ensure that the needs of refugees in the Kakuma and Dadaab camps are met.
Refugees
Kenya has a large refugee population of around 220,000 people, mostly from Somalia and Sudan. The government policy has been to house the refugees in two large camps in the northeast and northwest of the country. Kakuma camp, in the northwest, is home to approximately 83,000 people and Dadaab, in the northeast, to over 130,000. The camps are located in intensely arid zones, where they are generally not allowed to settle outside the camp or conduct business activities. This has created an almost total dependence on humanitarian assistance. The inability to develop their own coping mechanisms and their dependency on food aid is particularly concerning given the current problems with providing funding. This has prompted the International Rescue Committee (IRC), who oversee the activities in Kakuma camp, to highlight the issue to the US senate. The last survey to be conducted (see RNIS 36 and 37) indicated a prevalence of acute malnutrition well above emergency thresholds, and more commonly associated with acute nutritional emergencies and not with a population in a stable camp environment (IRC 04/06/02). The situation has not improved and has been attributed to the cut backs in the general ration which have been necessitated by funding problems for WFP. WFP have announced that they have been forced to reduce the food ration from the recommended 2100 Kcal to 1600 Kcal and that, unless further funding was forthcoming, further reductions were inevitable.
Fighting in the Gedo town of Bulo Hawa, borderingthe Kenyan Mandera district, has resulted in the influx of close to 10,000 Somalis. Approximately 5,000 returned to Somalia but the remainder are located a mere 500 m from the border and have remained largely inaccessible to humanitarian workers. The situation in Gedo, with regards to both security and the humanitarian situation, is extremely serious and many of the remaining refugees are reported to be in extremely poor shape. Up to 80 % of the refugees are reported to be women and children and there are very little available food and medical supplies. There has been considerable concern over the future of the refugees because the Kenyan government has been very reluctant to either repatriate them or move them to one of the designated refugee camps. Many refugees have been hesitant to relocate within Kenya because they anticipate returning as soon as the situation in Gedo improves. The RNIS does not have any nutrition information on this group but they are considered to be extremely vulnerable.
Overall
The overall situation in Kenya is showing signs of improvement although the chronic food and livelihood insecurity of some areas, particularly the northern pastoral regions, means that areas of acute need do still exist. The refugee population is considered to be at considerable risk (category II) of further nutritional decline if the food pipeline situation does not improve. There is also concern over the fate of recent Somali refugees in the Mandera district who should be considered at elevated risk of malnutrition.
Recommendations
From the RNIS
Kenya has been suffering from the regional Horn of Africa drought and as a result many, areas of the country have experienced episodes of acute food insecurity. The situation has improved over the course of 2001 and early 2002 with the advent of better rainfall and improved crop yield. This improvement in the general food security outlook has been particularly important for the pastoralist populations of the arid and semi arid marginal areas in the north of the country. However, the drought has extended over five seasons, substantially eroding the pastoral livelihoods of populations in the northern regions. This has left many chronically food insecure and ill able to cope with future shocks. As a result, needs in some areas are likely to remain high.
WFP has been conducting an extensive food aid programme across the country but has suffered from considerable budgetary restraints, making the food pipeline extremely precarious. General food distributions will be confined to an estimated one million persons in nine pastoral districts, requiring approximately 85,708 MT of food to last from April to September 2002. There is currently a shortfall in the food pipeline of 77,396 MT, consisting mostly of maize (FEWS 08/03/02).
Refugees
The number of refugees in Kenya is steadily increasing as a result of continued influxes from people fleeing the war in Southern Sudan. UN OCHA estimated that there were approximately 215,000 refugees at the start of 2002 with some 132,000, mostly Somali refugees, in Dadaab camp in the northeast and over 83,000 in Kakuma in the northwest (UN OCHA 22/03/02). However, it is reported that numbers are increasing steadily, particularly in Kakuma camp where it is estimated that numbers will increase to 90,000 during 2002 (ACT 08/01/02). The majority of new arrivals are women and children.
The camps are situated in the arid and semi arid northern zones of the country, with the situation for refugees made worse by the lack of a local settlement policy. As a result, there is 100 % dependence on the international community for food aid. The refugees are not permitted to herd livestock and their freedom of movement is restricted, further curtailing the possibility of developing coping mechanisms to facilitate alternative access to food sources. This has forced a high level of reliance on food aid, which is concerning due to funding shortfalls for the WFP food pipeline. WFP have reported that their programme faces a shortfall of 8,200 MT of food until the end of 2002 and urgent pledges are required to ensure that refugees continue to receive an adequate diet (WFP 26/04/02). The funding shortfalls have resulted in cuts to the general ration to around 1400 Kcal, which can detrimentally affect refugee nutritional status due to the high dependence the general ration. (WFP 20/02/02). WFP are hoping to be able to raise the ration but this will depend on future pledges.
The RNIS has not received any recent nutritional surveys from the refugee population but it is assumed that they remains extremely vulnerable to nutritional decline due to their dependency on food aid and lack of options for alternative livelihood activities. In particular it is alarming to note that nutritional surveys in 2001 indicated elevated levels of acute malnutrition and a high prevalence of micronutrient deficiency. This would strongly indicate that the diet quality of the refugees is poor and the continuation of sub optimal rations is likely to result in further deteriorations in nutritional status (see RNIS # 35).
Overall
There has been an improvement in the humanitarian situation as a whole in Kenya, however refugees remain highly vulnerable as a result of their dependence on food assistance and the lack of alternative livelihood options. As a result, the insecurity of the food pipeline due to funding shortfalls is alarming and the refugees should be seen as being at high risk of further nutritional decline (category II).
Recommendations
From the RNIS
Kenya has been suffering from the regional drought in the Horn of Africa and has seen acute food insecurity emerge in many areas of the country. The current outlook is for an improved situation in the traditional arable districts and highland areas of Western Kenya but the outlook in the north and east of the country remains poor. Pastoralists continue to be most at risk with areas of Turkana, Wajir, Garissa and the Tana River district being the worst affected (FEWS 07/09/01). There are wide spread reports of poor pasture and water availability, animal deaths and unseasonal migration. The situation is extremely concerning and a deterioration in nutritional status amongst affected populations is likely.
WFP is currently running an enormous food aid program all across Kenya and has suffered from poor funding, resulting in ration cuts in an attempt to avert breaks in the food pipeline. WFP recently announced that their drought relief programme is currently less than 50 percent funded and requires in excess of 34 million US dollars to meet shortfalls (WFP 02/11/01). As a result, a possible break in the pipeline is expected from November onwards. The current food basket is primarily cereals with shortfalls in pulses, critical for their protein content, beginning in October.
Refugees
In July 2001, UNHCR reported that there were an estimated 213,610 refugees in Kenya living in camps around Dadaab and Kakuma in the north east and north west of the country. The refugee populations remain highly dependent on food aid as a result of their inability to engage in economic activities and because the camps are situated in some of the areas most affected by the drought, precluding any agricultural activities. In Dadaab the food ration was substantially reduced, although it is reported that it was increased to 1,700 Kcal from the 1,399 Kcal that were distributed from mid April (OCHA 31/07/01). The RNIS has not received any new nutritional information from Dadaab but the continuation of drought conditions and problems of funding the food pipeline make the refugees extremely vulnerable.
In the last update the RNIS reported on a nutritional survey conducted by IRC/UNHCR and ICH in Kakuma refugee camp (see RNIS # 34). The survey had two components; the first being the assessment of acute nutritional status by anthropometry and the second the assessment of micronutrient status using biochemical indicators. As reported in the last RNIS, nutritional status is poor, with levels being above emergency thresholds. However, a series of surveys over the past few years indicate that the level of acute malnutrition in the population appears to have remained fairly constant at around 17%. The measurement of micronutrient status marks an important departure from the norm, where the focus has traditionally been on the supply of sufficient dietary energy (macronutrients) and has tended to see dietary quality as a secondary concern. The issue of dietary quality is of particular concern in longterm refugee communities. Refugees tend to be heavily dependent on food aid, particularly when in closed camp environments such as Kakuma. This results in very restricted access to food sources other than the general ration and this tends to result in poor diet quality.
The Institute of Child Health (ICH) performed a biochemical analysis on blood samples taken from amongst the refugee population. The biochemical survey indicated very high rates of anaemia in the under-five population with 61.3% of children having a haemoglobin level of below 11.0 g/dl of blood. Anaemia, although an indicator of iron deficiency, can be caused by numerous factors including infection, malaria and other parasitic infections. In order to control for this ICH performed a number of other tests, concluding that the high rate of observed anaemia was a result of iron deficiency (IRC/HCR/ICH 12/04/01). Vitamin A status was also assessed and it was estimated that 47% of children assessed had a serum retinol level below 0.7 µmol/L and were therefore classified as suffering from vitamin A deficiency. It is alarming to note that both the prevalence of iron deficiency anaemia and vitamin A deficiency are both well above emergency thresholds and are indicative of a problem of severe public health importance (WHO 96.10; 2000). The results highlight the need to focus on dietary quality particularly for long-term recipients of food aid. It is also concerning to note that the current deterioration of the humanitarian situation in Kenya with regards to the inadequacy of the existing food pipeline, and the deterioration in food security in the areas where the refugees are situated, means that the refugee populations will remain highly vulnerable to further deteriorations in both macro and micronutrient status.
Overall
There has been an improvement in the food security of some areas but further deterioration in the food security of pastoralists in the north east and west of the country have taken place. Refugees remain highly dependent on humanitarian assistance, with shortages and possible breaks in the pipeline, coupled with the deteriorating food security situation in areas where they are staying, contributing to their extreme vulnerability (category II).
Recommendations
From the IRC/HCR/ICH survey in Kakuma
Since the last issue of RNIS, the estimated number of drought affected people in need of assistance decreased from 4.4 million to about 3 million (OCHA). The long rains started in March, which considerably improved the food security outlook. Rains have benefited in particular the agricultural areas in the central and western areas of the country. However the outlook in some of the pastoral areas in the north and north-east is less optimistic with the almost total failure of the rains in May.
Earlier predictions of a break in the food pipeline in June were narrowly averted when the government of Kenya contributed an estimated 26,000 MT of cereals. However, funding shortfalls forced WFP to cut rations for supplementary feeding programmes in early June (WFP 08/06/01). There is also concern over the supply of oil and pulses for the general ration (FEWS 14/06/01).
Refugees
There remain an estimated 203,500 refugees from Sudan, Somalia, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Uganda, Burundi, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, in camps around Dadaab in the remote north-east of the country and in Kakuma camps in the north west (UNHCR 2001; USRC 2001). These camps are located in some of the districts worst affected by the recent drought (Garrissa and Turkana Districts respectively).
RNIS has received no new nutritional surveys from the Dadaab camps. However, an MSF press release stated that there had been an alarming increase in the number of children in the feeding programmes, from 72 under fives in January 2001 to 196 by mid June. Over the past six months, the refugees in Dadaab, north-eastern Kenya, have experienced a 35% drop in the amount of food distributed. This has meant that on average refugees are receiving a ration of 1,399 Kcals, instead of the recommended 2,100 Kcals. MSF attributes the increase in malnutrition to the observed cuts in refugee rations (MSF 26/06/01). The increase in malnutrition gives cause for concern, given that in February 2001 the prevalence of malnutrition was 16.1%, including 4.5% severe mal-nutrition (RNIS 32 and 33). At the time however, the coverage of feeding programmes was only 30% of the camp population, so the increase in the number of children in the feeding programmes could partly be a result of improved coverage.
IRC/UNHCR and ICH conducted a survey in Kakuma refugee camp in April 2001. At the time of the survey, the number of refugees was estimated at 72,459. The majority of the refugees are Sudanese, but there are also Somali, Ethiopian, Eritrean, Ugandan, Burundian, Rwandan and Congolese refugees (IRC/HCR/ICH 12/04/01). Whilst the survey assessed anthropometric and micronutrient status, the results of the micronutrient survey are not yet ready available and so only the anthropometric results are reported.
The results indicate an estimated prevalence of acute malnutrition of 17.2% (W/H <-2 Z-scores and / or oedema) including 1.4% severe (W/H <-3 Z-scores and / or oedema). These results are similar to those reported in RNIS 32 and 33, from a UNHCR survey in June 2000. The survey in June 2000 did not randomly sample the whole camp population, so the results of the two surveys are not strictly comparable. It does appear, however, that the prevalence of malnutrition in Kakuma camp, has remained stable at 17-18% (<-2 Z scores) since early 1999 (note that according to% of the median the prevalence of malnutrition is 8.5% <80% WFH). Coverage of the feeding programme is 32%. It is difficult to interpret the prevalence of malnutrition without further information on the health environment to estimate the health risks associated with malnutrition. From the survey report, the energy content of the ration appears good (2,200 Kcal), but no information on the equity of the distribution system is provided. The ration is inadequate in riboflavin.
Overall
The nutrition situation for refugees in Dadaab appears to be deteriorating (category II). Food rations for refugees in Dadaab have been inadequate, and they are located in one of the worst drought affected districts. The nutritional situation for refugees in Kakuma camps is stable, at moderately high prevalence of malnutrition (category III).
Recommendations
Dadaab camps
Kakuma camp (IRC/HCR/ICH 12/04/01).
Note: the RNIS is mandated to provide nutritional information on internally displaced and refugee populations. The RNIS cannot report comprehensively on the drought affected populations of Kenya, although the situation is very severe in some areas. More information can be obtained from www.reliefweb.int
OCHA reported that in February, over 4.4 million people in 22 Districts were suffering from the effects of drought in Kenya. Rains have been inadequate or failed for the last two years. The northern regions of the country remain most severely affected. The drought has resulted in massive loss of livestock and the emergence of acute food insecurity. Emergency food distribution started in some Districts in December 1999 (e.g. Turkana) and in others in July 2000 (e.g. Wajir and Garissa). The Kenya Humanitarian update in March 2001 reports that the scarcity of pasture and water in some northern areas has resulted in an increase in inter clan and inter tribal fighting particularly in the Mandera and Tana river districts. There have also been reports of banditry and on March 14th a UNICEF staff member was injured by bandits in the northern region. This has resulted in major security constraints for humanitarian personnel and many of the northern and eastern areas of the country remain under emergency phase III status, requiring military escorts for travel (IRIN OCHA 31/03/01; WFP 04/05/01).
In March 2001, OCHA reported that poor funding of the Donor Alert 2001 was becoming an issue of major concern with only 13% of the alert funded (OCHA 31/03/01). This has and will continue to impact on the food pipeline and WFP have reported serious pipeline shortages from May 2001, with no available oil or blended food. Due to a delay in the arrival of a 30,000 ton shipment, there will probably be a shortfall in June (WFP 04/05/01). Only 2,408,040 people were being targeted for the May general distribution, as in March. No food distribution took place in April as a result of the late finish of the March distribution (WFP 04/05/01).
FEWS reports that the general food security outlook has improved since the onset of the critical 2001 long rains season during the last weeks of March. There have been reports of fairly heavy rain in the northern pastoral districts, with the exception of Mandera and Wajir, and this has greatly heightened the prospects for significant improvements in grazing and water (FEWS 12/04/01).
However, it is important to emphasize that the prolonged nature of the drought has seriously impacted on people's livelihoods and food aid and other forms of assistance will be required to assist in recovery. The greatest cause for concern at the moment is the lack of donor interest that threatens to force severe ration cuts and generally impact on the quality of assistance to affected populations (IRIN OCHA 31/03/01).
Refugees
Following some repatriation, refugee numbers decreased from 215,000 to 203,500 over the course of 2000. The majority of refugees are from Somalia (135,600), Sudan (54,600), Ethiopia (4,000) and Uganda (5,800). During the course of 2000 some 13,000 refugees arrived in Kenya as a result of conflicts in neighbouring countries, particularly Sudan where an increase in insecurity in Sudan's East Equatoria district drove some 10,000 Sudanese refugees to Lokichokio in north western Kenya earlier in the year (UNHCR 2001).
MSF-B conducted a nutrition survey in the camps in Dadaab (Garissa District) in February 2001. The prevalence of acute malnutrition in February was of 16.1 % (< -2 Z-scores) and 4.5 % severe malnutrition including 3.4 % with oedema. The February survey showed no significant change since August 2000 (MSF-B 02/01).
The general ration supply was particularly low from June to October 2000, averaging of 1900 Kcals. MSF-B conducted some food basket monitoring and have shown a slight improvement in the ration since January with an estimated average of 1914 Kcals. However distribution of the ration amongst the refugees in the Dadaab area is inequitable (MSF-B 02/01).
In North East Kenya, drought induced food insecurity also became severe around July 2000, which will have impacted on the refugees, particularly as opportunities for finding other sources of food will have been more limited.
Although there does not appear to be much change in the Dadaab survey results from August to February, the remaining high prevalence of severe malnutrition is alarming and in particular the oedema. MSF-B suspects the oedema to be related to micro-nutrient deficiencies, and is hoping to collaborate with the Institute of Child Health in London to look further into the matter. Another cause for concern in the area is the low coverage of the feeding programmes with a reported coverage of 30.5 % in February, down from 37.8 % in August (MSF-B 02/01).
SCF-UK reported a similar phenomenon in neighbouring Wajir District from May to August 2000. In Eldas in North Wajir, 18 people began to show symptoms of multiple micronutrient deficiency from May to August 2000. All those presenting with symptoms had been surviving on a diet of relief maize alone and had not had milk since January/February. Symptoms decreased after the distribution of fortified UNIMIX (SCF-UK 09/00).
A nutrition survey was conducted in Kakuma refugee camp by UNHCR in June 2000. (UNHCR 06/00) The results indicate an estimated prevalence of malnutrition of 18.1 % (<-2 Z-scores) including 2.7 % severe. This prevalence is similar to that in May 1999. The survey in June 2000 excluded new arrivals (6 months prior to the survey) to the camp.
Given that new arrivals came from South Sudan in 2000, the survey done in June 2000 may therefore not reflect the true nutritional situation of the refugees in Kakuma. Sample size was not estimated appropriately for this survey.
Fifty two percent of children were reported to have suffered from illness, mainly diarrhoea, in the two weeks prior to the survey. The potential for finding other sources of food is extremely limited for refugees in Kakuma refugee camp, as movement outside the camp is restricted by the Government of Kenya. The survey was done at a time when Turkana District was experiencing severe drought induced food insecurity, which would have limited food and income sources for all in the District (UNHCR 06/00).
The increase in insecurity in areas containing refugee camps has eroded prospects for the refugees by limiting access to markets and to opportunities of paid employment. This has resulted in a very high degree of dependence on food aid, particularly during a period of acute food insecurity for the Kenyan population (UNHCR 06/00).
Overall
Overall the last year has seen the continuation of very serious drought conditions in much of the country. The latest food security reports indicate that long awaited rains have arrived in some Districts, and this will do much to alleviate the acute food needs of drought affected populations. However, the effects will take some time to show and it is expected that the need for emergency food aid will continue for some time to come. The prevalence of malnutrition has remained high in the refugee populations, due to rations inadequate in quantity and quality. Refugees have also been affected by the drought (Category III). The future development of the situation depends largely on continued donor support.
Recommendations
From the MSF survey in the Dabaab refugee camps
Note: the RNIS is mandated to provide nutritional information on internally displaced and refugee populations. The RNIS cannot report comprehensively on the drought-affected populations of Kenya, although the situation is very severe in some areas. More information can be obtained from www.reliefweb.int
Refugees
Kenya hosts some 215,000 Sudanese, Somali and Eritrean refugees in UNHCR camps in Dadaab and Kakuma. There is no new information on the nutritional situation of the refugees, which was reported to be uncritical in the most recent surveys and assessments (RNIS 29). However, it is likely that the refugees will be affected by the drought. The prices of local goods, including milk, will increase as their availability decreases. The refugee population are mainly pastoralists and regularly trade their relief food for milk. In addition, water will be more limited than normal, possibly causing hygiene and sanitation problems. These factors will probably result in an increase in the rate of malnutrition in the refugee populations.
Drought
Prolonged drought is increasing food insecurity throughout Kenya. Nearly 3.3 million people are in urgent need of food assistance. Apart from some areas in Western and Nyanza provinces, there has been very little or no rainfall in the rest of the country, leading to widespread crop failure and large livestock losses in pastoral areas in the north, northeast and northwest. Pastoral communities are of particular concern, as they are faced with the fourth consecutive failure of the rainy season. Prospects for the 2000 main cereal crop, which is normally harvested in October, are very unfavourable (WFP - 21/07/00).
As recorded in earlier droughts, destitute pastoralists are settling in the outskirts of district centres, however large numbers of displaced people have not yet been reported.
Turkana is one of the most affected districts. In March just before the long rains were expected, an Oxfam survey estimated the prevalence of acute malnutrition at 21.6%, including 4.6% severe acute malnutrition. CMR was estimated at 2.1/10,000/day and under-five mortality at 5.6/10,000/day. Since then, the long rains which normally account for 80% of total food production have failed. The prevalences of malnutrition can therefore be expected to increase until the end of the year. This situation calls for urgent action (Oxfam - 04/00).
An extension to WFP's EMOP for the drought-affected Kenyans was approved at the end June. About 30% of the operational requirements have been resourced so far. The food pipeline situation is thus not good for any commodities, particularly non-grains (WFP - 21/07/00).
Overall, the refugees are considered at heightened nutritional risk because of the drought (category III). The drought affected Kenyan population are at high risk of malnutrition and mortality.
Recommendations and priorities:
Refugees
There are currently some 215,000 Sudanese, Somalia and Ethiopian refugees in UNHCR camps in Dadaab and Kakuma. An estimated 20,000 new Somalia and Sudanese have sought refuge in the country since October 1999. WFP/UNHCR have reported a serious funding shortfall for the refugee operations in Kenya (IRIN - 01/03/00).
The RNIS has not received any new information on the nutritional situation of these refugees during the reporting period. The results of extensive food economy analyses and nutritional surveys were reported in RNIS 29. The food economy assessment found that the vast majority of the refugee population are almost entirely dependent on the ration provided by WFP and its donors. A break in the pipeline could have disastrous effects on the refugees nutritional situation.
Drought
An estimated 780,000 Kenyan