Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


LIST OF TABLES, FIGURES AND ANNEXES


Table 1 - Information Available on Total Refugee/Displaced Populations (as of end of April 1995)
Table 2 - Summary of Origin and Location of Major Populations of Refugees, Returnees and Displaced People in Africa as of April 1995 (population estimates In thousands)
Figure 1 - Refugee and Displaced Populations
Figure 2 - Trends in Total Refugee/Displaced Populations and Risk Categories
Figure 3 - Shaded areas indicate those at heightened nutritional risk
Annex 1 - Results of Surveys Quoted
Annex 2 - Seasonality

Table 1 - Information Available on Total Refugee/Displaced Populations (as of end of April 1995)

I

:

Those reported on with high prevalences of malnutrition and/or micronutrient disease and sharply elevated mortality (at least 3x normal)



IIa

:

At high risk. Limited data available, population likely to contain pockets of malnutrition



IIb

:

At moderate risk, may not foe data available. Population may contain pockets of malnutrition



IIc

:

Probably not currently in critical situation, nor known to be at particular risk



III

:

Population known to exist, but condition unknown





















Change in total

Total From


I

IIa

IIb

IIc

III

Total

Comments

Population

Feb 95 Report

Sub-Saharan Africa










1. Angola (id/wa)

57’000


3’143’000



3’200’000

The dependence on food old makes this population vulnerable to Interruptions In food del(...)

0

3’200’000

2. Benin/Ghana/Togo Region



49’000

279’000


328’000

Some refugees may be at moderate risk due to half rations supplied.

15’000

343’000

3. Burkina Faso



14’000

6’000


20’000

Newly arrived Touaregs at moderate risk.

0

20’000

4. Burundi/Rwanda Region




3’378’400


681’000


5’000




4’064’400


Shortages of food beginning to lead to deterioration In nutritional status.

1’064’400

3’000’000


Increased total due to revised estimate In Rwanda

0

5. Central African Republic



38’800



38’800

Somewhat precarious situation due erratic rations and inadequate water supply.

0

38’800

6. Djibouti




15’000


15’000

Decreased number is due to recent repatriation.

-15’000

30’000

7. Ethiopia

28’000


11’000

353’500

10’000

402’500

Increased total due to repatriation Iran Djibouti and the inclusion of displaced.

23’000

379’500

8. Kenya

31’000



199’000


230’000

Total continues to decrease due to repatriation. Ifo camp at high risk.

-2’000

232’000

9. Liberia/Sierra Leone/

141’000

1’500’000

925’000

767’000


3’333’000

New arrivals In Cote d’Ivoire at high risk due to elevated levels of wasting. New

135’000

3’198’000

Guinea/Cote d’Ivoire







arrivals In Guinea Forecariah also at high risk due to inadequate rations.

0


10. Mauritania/Senegal




52’000


52’000

Food assistance to be phased out by the end of 1995.

0

52’000

11. Mozambique Region




1’600’000


1’600’000

Some newly returned and inaccessible people likely to be vulnerable.

0

1’600’000

12. Shaba, Zaire (id)



393’000

200’000


593’000

Information from Likasi a downward trend in levels of wasting.

0

593’000

13. Somalia



600’000



600’000

No information indicating a change In the situation, despite the pullout of UN forces.

0

600’000

14. Sudan




1’400’000


1’400’000

This is revised estimate for 1994.

200’000

1’200’000

15. Uganda




323’000


323’000

Increased total due to continuing influx of Sudanese.

10’000

313’000

16. Zaire (r)




104’700


104’700

No change noted from RNIS 19.

0

104’700

17. Zambia




12’700


12’700

No change noted from RNIS IV.

0

12’700

Total (Sub-Saharan Africa)

257’000

4’878’400

5’854’800

5’316’900

10’000

16’317’100


1’400’400

14’916’700









0


Asia (Selected Situations)








0


18. Afghanistan Region



680’000

2’715’000


3’395’000

Displaced in Kabul at high risk with high levels of waiting.

75’000

3’320’000

20. Bhutanese Refugees In Nepal



87’000



87’000

The improved food basket is probably reducing Incidence of micronutrient deficienc(...).

2’000

85’000

19. Bangladesh




84’000


84’000

Repatriation for these refugees Is now underway.

-106’000

190’000

21. Southern Iraq


194’000


28’000


222’000

Those In Marshes considered at high risk.

0

222’000

Table 2 - Summary of Origin and Location of Major Populations of Refugees, Returnees and Displaced People in Africa as of April 1995 (population estimates In thousands)

From

To

Angola

Benin

Burundi

Cote d’Ivoire

Ethiopia

Ghana

Guinea

Kenya

Liberia

Malawi

Mozambique

Rwanda

Sierra Leone

Somalia

South Africa

Sudan

Tanzania

Togo

Uganda

Zaire

Zambia

Zimbabwe

TOTAL

Angola

3’200



















41

6


3’247

Benin























0

Burundi



300














89



110



499

Cote d’Ivoire























0

Ethiopia





11



10








200







221

Ghana






180

















180

Guinea























0

Kenya























0

Liberia




330


15

450


1’800














2’595

Malawi























0

Mozambique










50

1’500




5


36





20

1’611

Rwanda



193









1750





597


5

1’021



3’566

Sierra Leone







153


100




500










753

Somalia





259



191






600









1’050

South Africa























0

Sudan





51



29








1’200



310

62



1’652

Tanzania























0

Togo


49




84

















133

Uganda




















2



2

Zaire



















13

600

7


620

Zambia























0

Zimbabwe























0

TOTAL

3’200

49

493

330

321

279

603

230

1’900

50

1’500

1’750

500

600

5

1’400

722

0

328

1’836

13

20

16’129

NOTES:





(1) This chart is intended to include major population groups in Africa (i.e. over 100.000 people affected from country of origin).

(2) The breakdowns between the origins of the refugees in Guinea and Zambia are estimates.

(3) Boxes on the diagonal (bold outline) show internally displaced populations.

(4) Numbers referred to in the text are usually by the country where the population is located (i.e. column totals).

For the regional situations of Burundi/Rwanda and Mozambique the description is by country of origin (i.e. row totals).

Figure 1 - Refugee and Displaced Populations

Figure 1 - REFUGEE AND DISPLACED POPULATIONS - Selected Areas in Africa (April 95)

Figure 2 - Trends in Total Refugee/Displaced Populations and Risk Categories

Figure 2 - Trends in Total Refugee/Displaced Populations - By Risk Categories Africa: December 1993-April 1995

Figure 3 - Shaded areas indicate those at heightened nutritional risk

Figure 3 - A. Angola

Figure 3 - B. Burundi/Rwanda Region

Figure 3 - C. Kenya

Figure 3 - D. Liberia

Figure 3 - E. Mozambique

Figure 3 - F. Sudan

Annex 1 - Results of Surveys Quoted

Results of Surveys Quoted in April 1995 RNIS Report (#10)










Survey

Dale

% Wasted*

% Severely

Mortality

Other data

Conducted by

Wasted*

(/10,000/day)

1. Angola







a. Luena, Moxico

MSF-B

Dec.94

13.5

3.4


2.6% of wasting measured was oedema.

b. Luena. Moxico

WFP

Apr.95

20.3



Information from WFP Weekly Update.

c. Huambo

CONCERN

Jan.95

7.9




d. Melange

CONCERN

Jan.95

2.8




4. Burundi/Rwanda Region







a. Rumuvu Camp (Burundi)

AICF

Dec.94

1.0

0

0.3/10,000/day

Under-five mortality rate was 0.5/10.000/day.

b. Rumuvu 2 Camp (Burundi)

AICF

Jan.95

2.8

0.6



c. Kibezi Camp (Burundi)

AICF

Feb.95

1.6

0

0.5/10.000/day

Under-five mortality rote was 1.5/10.000/day.

d. Magara Camp (Burundi)

AICF

Feb.95

2.4

0.6

0.3/10.000/day

Under-five mortality rate was 0.7/10.000/day.

e. Kahindo Camp (Goma. Zaire)

MSF-B

Apr.95

6.4

3.2



f. Mugunga Camp (Goma. Zaire)

UNHCR

Mar.95

1.8

1.3

0.9/10.000/day

Under-five mortality rate: 1.97/10.000/day. (Note: mortality rates from Feb)

g. Katale Camp (Goma. Zaire)

MSF-H

Apr.95

2.2

1.0


No oedema was seen during the survey.

h. Kituku Camp (Goma. Zaire)

MSF-H

Apr.95

1.3

0.3


No oedema was seen during the survey.

7. Ethiopia







a. Displaced Camps - Addis Ababa

GOAL

Jan.95

3.2




8. Kenya







a. Ho Camp

MSF-F

Mar.95

15.4

1.9



b. Dagahale Camp

MSF-F

Mar.95

6.5

3.0



9. Liberia Region







a. Montserrado County. Liberia

MSF-H

Apr.95

7.3

1.2

0.89/10.000/day


b. Tabou. Cote d’Ivoire (refugee pop)

MSF-F

Jan.95

14.8

4.5

2/10.000/day

Under-five mortality rate was 5.6/10.000/day.

c. Tabou. Cote d’Ivoire (resident pop)

MSF-F

Jan.95

5.4

0.4

1.5/10.000/day

Under-five mortality rate was 1.9/10.000/day.

11. Mozambique Region







a. Angonia District

WV

Jan.95

7.7

3.7



b. Mutarara North

MSF-B

Feb.95

11.9

2.7



c. Alua

WV

Feb.95

14.6

2.8



12. Shaba/Kasai Regions, Zaire







a. Likasi

MSF-B

Feb.95

7.7

1.1


Continuation in a trend toward Improved nutritional status of this group.

b. Mwene Ditu

MSF-B

Mar.95

13.9

2.7



13. Somalia







a. Mogadishu

AICF

Nov.94

11.1

2.1



14. Sudan







a. Tonj (S Sudan)

WV

Dec.94

4.4 (80%)

0.7(70%)


Measles immunisation coverage of 6.7%.

15. Uganda







a. Koboko

MSF-H

Feb.95

7.2

2.5



18. Afghanistan Region







a. Jalalabad Camps

ICRC

Feb.95

28 (QUAC Stick)

3 (QUAC Stick)


Problems with water supply noted.

* wt/ht unless specified; cut-off=n.s. means not specified but usually -2SD wt/ht for wasting and -3SD wt/ht for severe wasting

NOTES

1. Angola

a. This was a random cluster survey conducted by MSF-Belgium in March 1995. A total of 937 children 6 months to 5 years old were measured. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2z scores and or oedema and severe wasting was defined as <-3z scores and/or oedema.

b. This information was included in the WFP Weekly Telex. No further details are currently available.

c and d. This information was received through a personnel communication, and no further details are currently available.

4. Burundi

a. This survey was conducted by AICF in December 1994. A total of 880 children 6-59 months old were included in the survey. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2z. scores and or oedema and severe wasting was defined as <-3z scores and/or oedema.

b. This survey was carried out by AICF in January 1995. This survey aimed to measure all the children in the camp. A total of 353 children 6-59 months old were included. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2z scores and or oedema and severe wasting was defined as <-3z. scores and/or oedema.

c. This survey was carried out by AICF in February 1995. A total of 865 children 6-59 months old were included in the survey. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2z scores and or oedema and severe wasting was defined as <-3z scores and/or oedema.

d. This survey was carried out by AICF in February 1995. A total of 1372 children 6-59 months old were included in the survey. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2z scores and or oedema and severe wasting was defined as <-3z scores and/or oedema.

e. This survey was carried out by MSF-Belgium in April 1995. No further details are currently available.

f. This survey was carried out by UNHCR in March 1995. This was a cluster survey that included 772 children 6-59 months old. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2z scores and or oedema and severe wasting was defined as <-3z scores and/or oedema.

g. This survey was carried out by MSF-Holland in April 1995. This survey measured children 65cm-110cm in height Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2z scores and or oedema and severe wasting was defined as <-3z scores and/or oedema.

h. This survey was carried out by MSF-Holland in April 1995. It included 780 children. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2z scores and or oedema and severe wasting was defined as <-3z scores and/or oedema.

7. Ethiopia

a. This survey was conducted by GOAL at the end of January. Wasting was defined as 80% weight for length, and a total of 880 children were included in the survey.

8. Kenya

a. This survey was carried out by MSF-France in March 1995. A total of 629 children were included in the survey. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2z scores and or oedema and severe wasting was defined as <-3z scores and/or oedema.

b. This survey was carried out by MSF-France in March 1995. A total of 601 children were included in the survey. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2z scores and or oedema and severe wasting was defined as <-3z scores and/or oedema.

9. Liberia Region

a. This survey was carried out by MSF-Holland at the end of April 1995. No further details are currently available.

b and c. This survey was carried out by MSF-France and EPICENTRE in January 1995. This was a random cluster survey that included children 6-59 months old. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2z scores and or oedema and severe wasting was defined as <-3z scores and/or oedema.

11. Mozambique Region

a. This survey was carried out by World Vision in January 1995. No further details are currently available.

b. This survey was carried out by MSF-Belgium in February 1995. No further details are currently available.

c. This survey was carried out by World Vision in February 1995. No further details are currently available.

12. Shaba/Kasi Regions

a. This survey was conducted by MSF-Belgium in February 1995. A total of 443 children 6-59 months old were measured. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2z scores and or oedema and severe wasting was defined as <-3z scores and/or oedema.

b. This survey was carried out by MSF-Belgium in March 1995. A total of 920 children 6-59 months old were measured. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2z scores and or oedema and severe wasting was defined as <-3z scores and/or oedema.

13. Somalia

a. This survey was conducted by AICF in November 1994. This was a random cluster survey that measured 477 children 6-59 months old. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2z scores and or oedema and severe wasting was defined as <-3z scores and/or oedema.

14. Sudan

a. This survey was carried out by World Vision in December 1994. It was a cluster survey measuring 433 children 75-115 cms in height. Wasting was defined as <80% weight/height and severe wasting <70%.

15. Uganda

a. This cluster survey was carried out by MSF-Holland in February 1995. A total of 600 children 6-59 months old were included. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2z scores and or oedema and severe wasting was defined as <-3z scores and/or oedema.

18. Afghanistan

a. This information is from a personal communication, and no further details are available.

Annex 2 - Seasonality

Seasonality in Sub-Saharan Africa*



Country

Climate/Rainy Season/Harvest



Angola

Coastal area desert, SW semi-arid, rest of country: rains Sept-April

Burundi

Three crop seasons: Sept-Jan, Feb-Jun, and Jul-Aug

CAR

Rains March-Nov

Djibouti

Arid Climate

Ethiopia

Two rainy seasons February to May and June to October

Kenya

N-E is semi-arid to arid, Central and SW rains: March-May and Nov-Dec

Liberia

Rains March-Nov

Mozambique

Coast is semi-arid, rest wet-dry. Harvest May

Rwanda

Rains Feb-May with Aug harvest and Sept-Nov with Jan harvest

Sierra Leone

Rains March-Oct.

Somalia

Two seasons: April to August (harvest) and October to January/February (harvest)

Sudan

Rains April-Oct

Northern

Rains begin May/June

Southern

Rains begin March/April

Togo

Two rainy seasons in S, one in N. Harvest August

Uganda

Rains Mar-Oct

Zaire

Tropical climate. Harvest in N; November; in S January

SOURCES:


FAO, ”Food Supply Situation and Crop Prospects in Sub-Saharan Africa”, Special Report; No 4/5, Dec. 90.

FAO, “FAO/WFP Crop and Food Supply Assessment Mission to Somalia” 9 Dec 94

FAO, “FAO/WFP Crop and Food Supply Assessment Mission to Burundi” 16 Dec 94

FAO, “FAO/WFP Crop and Food Supply Assessment Mission to Ethiopia” 16 Dec 94

FAO, “FAO/WFP Crop and Food Supply Assessment Mission to Sudan” 22 Dec 94

FAO, “FAO/WFP Crop and Food Supply Assessment Mission to Rwanda” 21 Dec 94


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page