Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


List of Tables, Figures and Annexes


Table 1. Information Available on Total Refugee/Displaced Populations
Table 2. Summary of Origin and Location of Major Populations of Refugees, Returnees and Displaced People In Africa
Figure 1. Refugee and Displaced Populations
Figure 2. Trends in Total Refugee/Displaced Populations and Risk Categories
Figure 3. Trends in Populations Estimates and Risk Categories in Six Countries
Annex 1. Surveys Quoted
Annex 2. Seasonality

Table 1. Information Available on Total Refugee/Displaced Populations

(as of end September 1995)

Situation

Condition

Population #s

Nut Stat

Comments

I: High Risk

IIa: High Risk

IIa: Mod. Risk

IIc: Not Critical

III: Unknown

Total

Change from Jul 95

Sub-Saharan Africa

1. Angola



1,400,000



1,400,000

0

imp

Pockets of malnutrition are likely to exist in accessible areas

2. Benin/Ghana/Togo




157,000


157,000

0

stat


3. Burkina Faso/Mauritania



41,000

33,000


74,000

13,000

imp

Nutritional status probably improving due to improved ration

4. Burundi/Rwanda Region

140,000

100,000

1,018,000

1,358,400

215,000

2,831,400

-336,500

stat

Decrease due largely to re-registration in Tanzania & repatriation and re-registration in Coma

5. Central Africa Republic




38,800


38,800

0

stat

Somewhat precarious situation due erratic rations & inadequate water supply

6. Djibouti




23,000


23,000

0

stat

Revised number of Somali refugees

7. Ethiopia

81,000


173,000

108,000

18,000

380,000

0

stat


8. Kenya



113,000

84,000


197,000

0

det

Nutritional situation appears to be deteriorating in Dadaab camps

9. Liberia Region

231,000

1,404,000

20,000

1,816,000


3,471,000

36,020

stat/d

Pockets of malnutrition exist in Liberia; deteriorating security & nutritional situation in Sierra Leone

10. Mauritania/Senegal




52,000


52,000

0

stat

Food assistance to be phased out by end 1995

11. Mozambique Region




600,000


600,000

440,000

imp

Total number is a planning figure for Mar95-Apr96. Pockets of malnutrition exist

12. Shaba, Zaire

60,000


340,000

200,000


600,000

0

det

Information from Mwene Ditu shows an alarming trend in levels of wasting

13. Somalia

138,000

462,000




600,000

0

det

The number of vulnerable people who are not displaced is probably far higher

14. Sudan



960,000

440,000


1,400,000

0

det

Logistic constraints in South, & closing camps near Khartoum, increase risk

15. Uganda



66,300

271,400


337,700

2,700

stat

Ikafe & Rhino camps ar risk due water/sanitation problems & elevated levels of wasting

16. Zaire (r)




104,700


104,700

0

stat


17. Zambia




12,700


12,700

0

stat


Total Sub-Saharan Africa

650,000

1,966,000

4,131,300

5.299,000

233,000

12,279,300

155,220



Asia (Selected Situations)

18. Afghanistan Region



790,000

2,700,000


3,490,000

'" 0 '

stat

Unknown number of displaced have returned home: Impact of returnees should be monitored

19. Bhutanese in Nepal

3,500


83,500



87,000

0

stat

Cases of beri beri, scurvy & anguair stomatitis seen

20. Bangladesh




52,000


52,000

-6,000

stat

Repatriation for these refugees is continuing

21. Southern Iraq


192,000


28,000


222,000

0

det

Those in Marshes considered at high risk

* Indicates status of nutritional situation. Imp = improving: det = deteriorating: stat - static (i.e. no change)

Table 2. Summary of Origin and Location of Major Populations of Refugees, Returnees and Displaced People In Africa

October 1995 · RNIS #12 (population estimates In thousands)

From

To/In

Angola

Benin

Burkina Faso

Burundi

Cote d'Ivoire

Ethiopia

Ghana

Guinea

Kenya

Liberia

Mali

Mauritania

Mozambique

Rwanda

Sierra Leone

Somalia

Sudan

Tanzania

Togo

Uganda

Zaire

Zambia

TOTAL

Angola

1400




















41

10

1'451

Benin























0

Burkina Faso























0

Burundi




100














101



75


276

Cote d'Ivoire























0

Ethiopia






11*



6








200*






217

Ghana























0

Guinea























0

Kenya






24

















24

Liberia





305


14

408


1'900













2'627

Mali



33









41











74

Mauritania























0

Mozambique













600










600

Rwanda




215










725




528


6

1'081


2'555

Sierra Leone








128


100





730








958

Somalia






272



158







600







1'030

Sudan






55



33








1'200



324

50


1'662

Tanzania























0

Togo


45





98
















143

Uganda





















14


14

Zaire




















14

600

7

621

Zambia























0

TOTAL

1'400

45

33

315

305

351

112

536

197

2'000

0

41

600

725

730

600

1'400

629

0

344

1'861

17

12'241


NOTES

(1) This chart is intended to include major population groups in Africa (i.e. over 100,000 people affected from country of origin)

(2) The breakdowns between the origins of the refugees in Guinea and Zambia are estimates

(3) Boxes on the diagonal (bold outline) show internally displaced populations (total =79 million)

(4) Numbers referred to in the text are usually by the country where the population is located (i.e. column totals).

For the regional situations of Burundi/Rwanda and Mozambique the description is by country of origin (i.e. row totals)

* These figures include an unknown number of Eritrean refugees

Figure 1. Refugee and Displaced Populations

Selected Areas In Africa (October 1995)

Figure 2. Trends in Total Refugee/Displaced Populations and Risk Categories

Africa: December 1993-October 1995

Figure 3. Trends in Populations Estimates and Risk Categories in Six Countries

A. Angola

B. Burundi/Rwanda Region

C. Liberia

D. Mozambique

E. Somalia

F: Sudan

Shaded areas indicate those at heightened nutritional risk (categories I and IIa in Table 1).

Annex 1. Surveys Quoted

Results of Surveys Quoted In October 1995 RNIS Report (#12)


Survey Conducted by

Date

% Wasted*

% Severely Wasted*

Crude Mortality (/10.000/day)

Under 5 Mortality ((/10,000/day)

Measles Immunisation Coverage

1. Angola

a. Caconda. Huila Province

MSF-S

Aug.95

14.7

1.1




4. Burundi/Rwanda Region

a. Rwanda (national survey)

Mm of Health

May.95

9.7





b. Rwanda (prefecture)

MSF-S

May.95

2.9





c. Musuhura Hill Camp (Tanzania)

MSF-H

Jul.95

6.3

3.1




d. Hongo (Bukavu, Zaire)

UNHCR

Jul.95

5.2

1.6



92.4%

e. Kabira (Bukavu. Zaire)

UNHCR

Jul.95

2.8

0.2



94.0%

f. Kashusa (Bukavu. Zaire)

UNHCR

Jul.95

1.5

0.2



93.7%

g. Nyamirangwe (Bukavu. Zaire)

UNHCR

Jul.95

4.8

0.0



94.4%

h. Runingo (Uvira, Zaire)

UNHCR

Aug.95

21.6

12.3




i. Kajembo (Uvira, Zaire)

UNHCR

Aug.95

11.8

6.6




j. Luberizi (Uvia, Zaire)

UNHCR

Aug.95

10.7

3.8



61.1%

k. Kagunga (Uvira, Zaire)

UNHCR

Aug.95

6.1

2.0



47.8%

l. Rwenena (Uvira. Zaire)

UNHCR

Aug.95

6.5

1.8



55.7%

m. Kamanyola (Uvira. Zaire)

UNHCR

Aug.95

1.4

0.6



50.4%

n. Lubarika (Uvira, Zaire)

UNHCR

Aug.95

2.1

0.0



48.3%

o. Biriba (Uvira, Zaire)

UNHCR

Aug.95

2.7

2.2



37.1%

p. Luvungi (Uvira. Zaire)

UNHCR

Aug.95

9.1

2.1



62.5%

8. Kenya

a. Hagadera

MSF-B

Aug.95

12.1

2.4



87.7%

b. Ifo

MSF-B

Aug.95

12.1

4



89.6%

c. Dagahaley

MSF-B

Aug.95

9.8

1.5



82.8%

9. Liberia Region

a. Lower Bong. Upper Margbi (Liberia)

SCF

Jul.95

19.1

5.2(37.1%oedema)




b. Kenema Town (Sierra Leone)

MSF-H

Aug.95

21

7.7

2.4

5.6

69%

b. Kenema RTI Camp (Sierra Leone)

MSF-H

Aug.95

37

11.5

5.2

19

72.0%

d. Tabou Pref, refugees (Cote d'Ivoire)

CARITAS

Jul.95

8 (<80%)

2 (<70%)




e. Tabou Pref. residents (Cote d'Ivoire)

CARITAS

Jul.95

8.8 (<80%)

2.4 (<70%)




f. Foreccariah Pref (Guinea)

OXFAM

Aug.95

8.2

0.7



42.9%

11. Mozambique Region

a. Namapa, Nampula

WV

Jul.95

4.0

0.3




b. Namapa, Nampula

WV

Jul.95

4.3

1.6




c. Namapa. Nampula

WV

Aug.95

1.9

0.5




d. Magoe District, Tete

MSF-CIS

Aug.95

5.0

2.1




e. Chibabave, Sofala Province

MSF-CIS

Jul.95

3.3 (3rd%ile)





f. Nicoadala. Zambezia Province

WV

Jul.95

3.5 (<80%)





13. Somalia

a. Mogadishu (resident)

AICF

Jun.95

25.1

6.4



54.3%

b. Mogadishu (displaced)

AICF

Jun.95

26.3

5.4



54.3%

c. Kismayo (Town)

UNICEF"

Jul.95

17.8

2.7



97.9%

d. Kismayo (Displaced Camps)

UNICEF"

Jul.95

11.6

1.8



64.0%

15. Uganda

a. Ikafe

EPICENTRE

Apr.95

6.9

2.0

0.54

1.7

78.0%

b. Koboko

EPICENTRE

Jul.95

8.2

1.9

0.31

1.4

92.7%

c. Rhino

EPICENTRE

Jul.95

13.9

3.8

0.41

1.3

81.5%

18. Afghanistan Region

a. New Hadda Camp

MSF-H

Sep.95

11.1

1.5




b. Kandahar. Afghanistan (villages)

MERLIN

Jun.95

13.4



4.8


c. Kandahar, Afghanistan (city)

MERLIN

Jun.95

9.3



4.8


19. Bhutanese Refugees in Nepal

a. All 8 Camps

SCF/UNHCR

Jun.95

5.7

0.9


0.2

97.0%

*wt/ht unless specified: cut-off=n.s. means not specified but usually-2SD wt/ht for wasting and -3SD wt/ht for severe wasting

**AMREF-African Medical and Research Foundation III

***Jointly conducted by: UNICEF, MSF, World Concern. Muslim-Aid-UK and Somali Red Crescent Society

Notes on Annex I

1. Angola

a. This survey was conducted by MSF-Spain in August 1995. No further details are currently available.

4. Burundi/Rwanda Region

a. This was a national survey carried out by the Ministry of Health in May 1995. A total of 1016 children (0-5 years old) were included in the survey. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2 z scores.

b. This survey was carried out in three communes in one district by MSF-Spain. A total of 1292 children 0-5 years old were included. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2 z scores.

c. This survey was carried out by MSF-Holland in Musuhura Hill Camp, Tanzania in July 1995. Systematic random sampling was used and children 65-110 cms were included. A total of 543 children were weighed and measured. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2z scores or oedema and severe wasting was defined as weight/height <-3z scores or oedema.

d-g. These surveys were carried out by UNHCR in Bukavu in July 1995. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2z scores and severe wasting was defined as weight/height <-3z scores. Oedema was measured separately.

h-k. These are preliminary results from four surveys carried out by UNHCR in Uvira in August 1995. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2sd or oedema and severe wasting was defined as weight/height <-3sd or oedema.

l-p. These are results from five surveys carried out by UNHCR in Uvira in August 1995. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2sd or oedema and severe wasting was defined as weight/height <-3sd or oedema.

8. Kenya

a. This survey was carried out by MSF-Belgium in August 1995 in Hagadera Camp. It was a two stage cluster sample survey that included 785 children 6-59 months old (or 65-110 cms in height) for a sample size of 785. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2sd or oedema and severe wasting was defined as weight/height <-3sd or oedema.

b. This survey was carried out by MSF-Belgium in August 1995 in Ifo Camp. It was a two stage cluster sample survey that included 761 children 6-59 months old (or 65-110 cms in height) for a sample size of 785. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2sd or oedema and severe wasting was defined as weight/height <-3sd or oedema.

c. This survey was carried out by MSF-Belgium in August 1995 in Dagahaley Camp. It was a two stage cluster sample survey that included 760 children 6-59 months old (or 65-110 cms in height) for a sample size of 785. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2sd or oedema and severe wasting was defined as weight/height <-3sd or oedema.

9. Liberia Region

a. This survey was conducted by SCF at the end of July 1995 in Lower Bong/Upper Margibi Counties. A random weighted cluster sampling method was used and 769 children 65-110cms were included. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2sd or oedema and severe wasting was defined as weight/height <-3sd or oedema.

b. This survey was conducted by MSF-Holland in Kenema Town in August 1995. 1071 children 6-59 months old were included in the survey. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2sd or oedema and severe wasting was defined as weight/height <-3sd or oedema.

c. This survey was conducted by MSF-Holland in RTI Camp for displaced people outside of Kenema Town in August 1995. 330 children 6-59 months old were included in the survey. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2sd or oedema and severe wasting was defined as weight/height <-3sd or oedema.

d. This cluster survey was carried out by CARITAS in July 1995 in Tabou Prefecture. 500 Liberian refugees 6-59 months old were included. Wasting was defined as <80% of the mean and severe wasting was defined as <70%. Oedema was measured separately.

e. This cluster survey was carried out by CARITAS in July 1995 in Tabou Prefecture. 499 local residents 6-59 months old were included. Wasting was defined as <80% of the mean and severe wasting was defined as <70%. Oedema was measured separately.

f. This survey was conducted by OXFAM in August 1995 in Foercahiah, Guinea. A systematic sampling procedure was used and 422 children 65-110 cms were included. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2sd or oedema and severe wasting was defined as weight/height <-3sd or oedema.

11. Mozambique

a-b. These two surveys were conducted by World Vision in July 1995. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2z scores and severe wasting as <-3z scores.

c. This survey was conducted by World Vision in August 1995. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2z scores and severe wasting as <-3z scores.

d. This survey was carried out by MSF-CIS in August 1995 in Magoe District, Tete Province. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2sd or oedema and severe wasting was defined as weight/height <-3sd or oedema.

e. This survey was conducted in July 1995 in Chibabave District, Sofala Province. Wasting was defined as weight/height less than the third percentile.

f. This survey was conducted by World Vision in July 1995 in Nicoadala District, Zambezia Province. Wasting was defined as weight/height <80% of the mean.

13. Somalia

a. This survey was conducted by AICF in June 1995 in Mogadishu. A two stage random cluster survey was carried out and 906 resident children 6-59 months old were included. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2sd or oedema and severe wasting was defined as weight/height <-3sd or oedema.

b. This survey was conducted by AICF in June 1995 in Mogadishu. A two stage random cluster survey was carried out and 908 displaced children 6-59 months old were included. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2sd or oedema and severe wasting was defined as weight/height <-3sd or oedema.

c. This survey was jointly conducted by UNICEF, MSF, World Concern, Muslim Aid-UK and the Somali Red Cross Society in July 1995. This was a random sample survey and the results are expressed for the resident population (n=622) and for the displaced population (n=735). Children less than or equal to 110cm were included. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2sd or oedema and severe wasting was defined as weight/height <-3sd or oedema.

15. Uganda

a-c. These three surveys were conducted by EPICENTRE. They were cluster samples. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2sd or oedema and severe wasting was defined as weight/height <-3sd or oedema.

18. Afghanistan

a. This survey was conducted by MSF-Holland in September 1995. 612 children were included. Wasting was defined as weight/height <-2sd or oedema and severe wasting was defined as weight/height <-3sd or oedema.

b. These surveys were conducted by MERLIN in June 1995. Results are expressed separately for the villages surrounding the towns and the city itself. A random sample of children 6-59 months was carried out. When age was uncertain, less than 115 cm was used as an approximation. Wasting was defined as <-2z scores and severe wasting was defined as <-3z scores.

19. Bhutanese Refugees in Nepal

a. This survey was jointly conducted by SCF and UNHCR in July 1995. It was a cross-sectional survey using a stratified sampling method. 330 children 6-60 months were included. Wasting was defined at weight/height <80% of the median and severe wasting was <70%.

Annex 2. Seasonality

Seasonality in Sub-Saharan Africa*

Country

Climate/Rainy Season/Harvest

Angola

Coastal area desert, SW semi-arid, rest of country: rains Sept-April

Burundi

Three crop seasons: Sept-Jan, Feb-Jun, and Jul-Aug

CAR

Rains March-Nov

Djibouti

Arid Climate

Ethiopia

Two rainy seasons February to May and June to October

Kenya

N-E is semi-arid to arid, Central and SW rains: March-May and Nov-Dec

Liberia

Rains March-Nov

Mozambique

Coast is semi-arid, rest wet-dry. Harvest May

Rwanda

Rains Feb-May with Aug harvest and Sept-Nov with Jan harvest

Sierra Leone

Rains March-Oct.

Somalia

Two seasons: April to August (harvest) and October to January/February (harvest)

Sudan

Rains April-Oct


Northern

Rains begin May/June


Southern

Rains begin March/April

Togo

Two rainy seasons in S, one in N. Harvest August

Uganda

Rains Mar-Oct

Zaire

Tropical climate. Harvest in N: November; in S January


*SOURCES:

FAO, "Food Supply Situation and Crop Prospects in Sub-Saharan Africa", Special Report; No 4/5, Dec. 90 plus various FAO/WFP Crop and Food Supply Assessment Missions.


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page