Table 2: Information Available on Total
Refugee/Returnees/Displaced Populations requiring assistance
(as of July 2000).
Please note that these are best estimates at the time of
going to press
|
Situation |
Population Numbers |
Nutr Stat* |
Comments |
|||||||
|
Condition |
Total |
Change from Jul-01 |
||||||||
|
I: V. High Risk |
II: High Risk |
III: Mod Risk |
IV: Not Critical |
V: Unknown |
||||||
|
Sub-Saharan Africa |
||||||||||
|
1. Angola |
|
2,500,000 |
900,000 |
|
|
3,400,000 |
-400,000 |
imp. |
Situation remains extremely precarious for many and lack of access continues
to be a problem |
|
|
2. Great Lakes Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Burundi |
100,000 |
100,779 |
179,000 |
|
|
379,779 |
779 |
sta |
IDPs and returnees remain at high risk in many areas of the country |
|
E Dem Rep of Congo |
990,000 |
932,000 |
260,000 |
152,000 |
|
2,334,000 |
0 |
det. |
IDPs at v. high risk in worst war-affected areas. Others high to moderate.
Refs. no change. |
|
|
Tanzania |
|
5,723 |
532,850 |
|
|
538,573 |
11,573 |
det. |
Refs. at high risk due to cut in rations. Draught-affected not shown |
|
|
3. Eritrea |
|
58,163 |
|
|
|
58,163 |
-150,000 |
imp. |
Many war displaced have returned but mines and poor rains contribute
to continued food insecurity |
|
|
4. Ethiopia |
|
|
60,000 |
10,780 |
|
70,780 |
531,465 |
imp. |
Many War IDPs have returned. Refs. not critical. V. severe situ. of drought-affected
population not shown. |
|
|
5. Kenya |
|
|
213,610 |
|
|
213,610 |
10,110 |
sta |
Refs. at heightened risk due to drought. Situ. of drought-affected population
not shown. |
|
|
6. Liberia/Sierra Leone Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liberia |
|
75,000 |
55,000 |
20,000 |
|
150,000 |
30,000 |
det. |
Refs. in upper Lofa at higher risk due to insecurity. |
|
Sierra Leone |
125,000 |
400,000 |
450,000 |
|
600,000 |
1,575,000 |
-25,000 |
imp. |
IDP nos. v. imprecise. Those in Govt. areas v. high /high to mod. risk,
others unknown. Refs. unknown. |
|
|
Guinea-Conakry/Cote d'Ivoire |
60,000 |
230,000 |
400,000 |
|
|
690,000 |
30,000 |
imp. |
Many Refs from Guinea have repatriated to Sierra Leone and Liberia |
|
|
7. Somalia |
40,000 |
80,000 |
237,000 |
|
|
357,000 |
0 |
sta |
IDPs in Mogadishu at high risk. Others at high to very high risk. |
|
|
8. S. Sudan |
412,386 |
1,632,000 |
833,223 |
99,320 |
|
2,976,929 |
9,817 |
det. |
IDPs in Darfur, Kordofan, E Equitoria and N Bahr al Ghazal high/v. highrisk.
Others mod. |
|
|
9. Uganda |
|
340,000 |
440,000 |
219,175 |
|
999,175 |
89,175 |
stat. |
IDPs high to moderate risk. Refs. not critical. |
|
|
10. Zambia |
|
|
251,254 |
15,000 |
|
266,254 |
41,254 |
stat. |
Refs. at mod. risk due to funding problems. IDPs not critical. |
|
|
Total |
1,727,383 |
6,353,665 |
4,811,937 |
516,275 |
600,000 |
14,009,263 |
-883,757 |
|
|
|
|
Asia / Europe (Selected Situations) |
||||||||||
|
11. Afghanistan Region |
450,000 |
1,000,000 |
1,650,000 |
500,000 |
|
3,600,000 |
650,000 |
det. |
Extensive drought and conflict induced displacement within the country
and to neighbouring areas |
|
I: High Prev - Those reported with high prevalences of malnutrition (where available >20% wasting) and/or micronutrient deficiency diseases and sharply elevated mortality (×3 normal)The number of refugees, returnees and IDPs in Sub-Saharan Africa and their nutritional risk over timeII: High Risk - Population at high risk, limited data available, population likely to contain pockets of malnutrition (e.g. wasting).
IIb: Mod Risk - Population at moderate risk, may be data available, pockets of malnutrition may exist.
IIc: Not Critical - Probably not at heightened nutritional risk.
III: Unknown - No information on nutritional status available.
* Indicates status of nutritional situation. Imp = improving; det = deteriorating; stat = static (i.e. no change).
RESULTS OF SURVEYS QUOTED IN JULY 2001 RNIS # 34
|
Survey Area |
Survey conducted by |
Date |
% Wasted** |
% Severely Wasted** |
Oedema |
Crude Mortality |
Under 5 Mortality |
Measles immunisation cover- age (%) |
|
The Greater Horn of Africa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ETHIOPIA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borana Zone |
GOAL |
03/01 |
4.6 |
0 |
0 |
0.8 |
1.6 |
- |
|
Fafan IDP camps |
UNICEF |
30/04/01 |
21.2 |
3.3 |
- |
- |
N/a |
- |
|
Goncha Siso Enese Woreda |
SCF-UK |
05/06/01 |
8.5 |
0.4 |
0 |
1.31 |
0.59 |
30.7 |
|
KENYA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kakuma camp |
IRC/HCR/ICH |
12/04/01 |
17.2 |
1.4 |
0.2 |
- |
- |
93.6 |
|
SUDAN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twic county |
GOAL |
12/02/00 |
26 |
2.4 |
0 |
0.5 |
0.85 |
- |
|
North Darfur |
SCF-UK |
04/01 |
23.4 |
2.1* |
|
Question |
Question |
36.6 |
|
Old Fangak District |
AAH-US |
04/01 |
20.4 |
3.0 |
0.1 |
- |
- |
4 |
|
Maraeng District |
AAH-US |
04/01 |
21.3 |
2.3 |
0 |
- |
- |
0.9 |
|
Kuajok Payam |
MSF-B |
05/01 |
15.5 |
2.2 |
|
- |
- |
17.7 |
|
Aweil East |
TEARFUND |
06/01 |
28.9 |
5.5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
West African Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIERRA LEONE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenema district rural |
Goal |
02/01 |
5.2 |
1.0 |
0.6 |
|
0.97 |
49.3 |
|
The Great Lakes Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BURUNDI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bubanza |
CAD |
03/01 |
8.6 |
2.2 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
5 |
81 |
|
DRC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Masina and Kim-banseke |
SCF-UK |
04/01 |
11 |
2 |
1.2 |
- |
0.77 |
- |
|
Kalima, Maniema |
Merlin |
05/01 |
4.6 |
0.9 |
0.2 |
1.2 |
3.6 |
22 |
|
UGANDA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulu district Eastern Camps |
ACF-US |
03/01 |
6.7 |
1 |
0 |
- |
1.78 |
73.1 |
|
Gulu district Western Camps |
ACF-US |
03/01 |
7.7 |
1.8 |
0.1 |
- |
2.27 |
76.6 |
* Oedema is included in this figure** wt/ht unless specified; cut-off = n.s. means not specified but usually -2z scores wt/ht for wasting and -3z scores for severe wasting.
MUAC unless specified cut-off for wasting is <125 mm and <110 mm for severe wasting.
NOTE: see box on back cover for guidance in interpretation of indicators.
RESULTS OF SURVEYS QUOTED IN JULY 2001 RNIS # 34
|
Survey Area |
Survey con- ducted by |
Date |
% Wasted** |
% Severely Wasted** |
Oedema |
Crude Mortality |
Under 5 Mortality |
Measles immunisation coverage (%) |
|
Southern African Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANGOLA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ganda (displaced) |
ACH |
05/01 |
9.5 |
1.1 |
0.5 |
1.28 |
3.11 |
46.6 |
|
Ganda (resident) |
ACH |
05/01 |
10.1 |
1.1 |
0.3 |
1.41 |
2.1 |
57.2 |
|
Cuito Cuanavale |
ACH |
13/06/01 |
6 |
1.9 |
- |
1.6 |
4.1 |
41.6 |
|
Afghan Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Faryab Province |
SCF-US |
10/04/01 |
7.0 |
1.1 |
- |
2.6 |
5.9 |
- |
|
Tajikistan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Island #13 |
AAH-UK |
10/04/01 |
2.73 |
0.45 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Niawama IDP camp |
Goal |
02/01 |
3.9 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
- |
0.91 |
81.6 |
* Oedema is included in this figure** wt/ht unless specified; cut-off = n.s. means not specified but usually -2z scores wt/ht for wasting and -3z scores for severe wasting.
MUAC unless specified cut-off for wasting is <125 mm and <110 mm for severe wasting.
NOTE: see box on back cover for guidance in interpretation of indicators.
