| |
RNIS 43, November 2003
ASIA - Selected Situations
The security situation remains tense in many parts of the country because of
factional fighting and banditry. Humanitarian agencies have increasingly been
targeted (WFP, 02/04/03).
Refugees and IDPs
Number of refugees returning was low at the beginning of 2003; only 8,800
people were voluntary repatriated in January /February 2003 (USAID, 13/03/03).
UNHCR signed a new agreement with the Pakistan and Afghanistan governments
for the voluntary repatriation of 600,000 refugees in 2003 (GoP, 18/03/03).
Facilitated refugee repatriation in 2002 has raised concern. According to an
independent research and evaluation unit (Afghanistan Research and Evaluation
Unit), encouragement of the return of refugees in 2002 has been premature, as
refugees did not find adequate conditions at their destinations. The study cites
pressure from host governments to see refugees repatriated, donors' tiredness in
supporting refugees in host countries, and limited release of funds for
development in Afghanistan (AREU, 31/12/02). Some of the report's
recommendations are: increasing the amounts pledged for reconstruction and
emergency aid and speeding up the release of funds for development; expanding
the International Security Assistance Force to each of the 32 provincial
capitals; investing more resources in monitoring returnees to provide reliable
information about areas of return; increasing direct donor support for UNHCR's
protection activities in Pakistan and Iran.
Pakistani authorities have planned to close Katcha Garhi camp, which hosts
600,000 refugees in the suburbs of Peshawar. Refugees will have no other choices
than going back to Afghanistan or finding an other place in Pakistan (UNHCR,
25/03/03).
About 700,000 people remain displaced throughout Afghanistan. IOM has
assisted the return of 9,000 IDPs since the beginning of the year (IOM,
28/03/03). Notably some IDPs are still reported to be moving from the north to
the south because of harassment and insecurity in the north (OCHA, 15/04/03).
Food security situation
WFP and partners conducted a food needs assessment of the rural settled
population (WFP/VAM, 2002-2003). Food security improved in 2002 compared to
2001, especially in the north-west of the country, whilst little improvement and
even in some cases a deterioration has been experienced in the south (see map).
Food through own production has increased in many districts, except in the south
where drought has continued.

Many districts however remains moderately to highly food insecure, especially
in the south (see map). Drought and war still have very negative effects on food
security. Due to the loss of seeds, tools, and traction animals, it is estimated
that the 2002 cultivation of land in the northern rainfed belt was only 10-30%
of the pre-drought years. Underground aquifers are also still not replenished;
this has hampered irrigated culture, which also suffers from infrastructural
damage. It is hoped that the improvement of pasture conditions in the north,
west, and central Afghanistan, and the increase in livestock market prices will
allow beginning of restocking. Labour opportunities in the agricultural sector
are scarce as a consequence of the drought. Moreover, the closing of the borders
with Iran and Pakistan will limit the traditional economic migration.

Whilst in the south and in some pockets throughout the country food aid is
still needed for saving lives, in other parts of the country food aid will
promote long-term food security by helping people rebuild their livelihoods.
| Afghanistan
La situation reste tendue en Afghanistan où les agences humanitaires
sont de plus en plus prises pour cible.
Une étude a mis en avant le fait que le rapatriement massif des
réfugiés en 2002 aurait été trop rapide, les réfugiés ne trouvant pas des
conditions de vie décentes à leur retour.
La situation alimentaire s'est améliorée par rapport à 2001,
essentiellement dans le nord-ouest du pays, alors qu'elle est restée
stable ou s'est légèrement détériorée dans le sud (voir carte). Les
besoins en aide alimentaire varient selon les régions et sont
particulièrement importants dans le sud du pays (voir carte). |
|