|
|
|
Report of the Sub-Committee on Nutrition at its Twenty-Fifth SessionII. Work in Progress: Summary of Discussion and ConclusionsC. Reports of decisions taken in Working GroupsC.2 Iodine Deficiency Disorders -- Report of the Working Group
coordination of databases will be the responsibility of all those currently managing databases, and would be enhanced by use of the world-wide web; WHO will make copies of the "10 Key Points for Sustainability" available to members of the SCN. Full Report of the Meeting of the Working Group on Iodine Deficiency DisordersSaturday 28 March 1998, Oslo, Norway Chair: Dr Graeme Clugston, WHO Introduction In opening the meeting, the chairman highlighted the continuing massive problem of IDD. He drew attention to the exciting progress that has been achieved, but stressed the emergence of three potential constraints:
Overview of the problem and status of programmes (F. Delange) A review was presented of the current status of IDD and its control on a global basis. Massive implementation of USI programmes was reported along with concrete examples of country programmes in, Asia, Africa, Europe and the Americas. Although elimination of IDD has not yet been achieved in many countries, a spectacular trend towards the goal is obvious. Experiences in most countries, including in a few with unfavourable side effects to salt iodization, underline the absolute need for sustained and permanent monitoring. It was clear that at population level, the two main indicators of adequacy of iodine supplementation are the iodine content of salt and of urine. The need for additional data on the qualitative and quantitative improvement of the intellectual capacity of children following correction of iodine deficiency was stressed. The discussion ended with a rapid review of key issues in the different regions. Particularly salient was the fragility of some national programmes which were previously well-established due to unexpected socio-economic and political events. Contrasting with the national successes in Peru and Bolivia, for example, recent failures in programmes were noticed in Brazil and Mexico. A similar or even more dramatic relapse of IDD has been observed in the former USSR after interruption of salt iodization programmes in 1991. Solid progress was reported from the Asian region. Critical gaps and key issues 1. Sustainability. The ten key requirements for ensuring sustainability of country programmes were presented (see Annex 1). In addition the discussion underlined the importance of additional points, including:
2. Databases. A review of the presently available databases was performed (WHO, UNICEF, ICCIDD, MI, IAEA). The discussion agreed that there is a need for improving the co-ordination between these different databases and for improving the access to these databases through the web. 3. Kits to measure iodine in salt. Several countries, including Indonesia, Bangladesh, Thailand, Ecuador, Sri Lanka, China, and India, have developed their own kits which have been useful for qualitative evaluation of iodine ins alt at household level. MI reported recent developments in the production of a semi-quantative, simplified, portable titration kit, testing iodine in salt in a liquid phase. This kit has been successfully tested in Ecuador, India, and Ghana. It should be rapidly available on a large scale, based on collaboration between UNICEF Copenhagen and MI. 4.. Kits to measure iodine in urine. The availability of two simplified semi-quantitative analytical methods of measure of iodine in urine samples were reported. a) Method developed by MERCK Darmstadt, Germany, and b) Method developed by ICCIDD (Dr John Dunn). These new methods should be available quite soon and increase the availability and ease of measurement of urinary iodine in the field. Reports from agencies Reports were given the UN organizations, the bilateral cooperation agencies and NGOs on their own specific activities. Conclusions and recommendations The working group recognized that iodine deficiency continues to be the single most common cause of preventable retardation. Major efforts have been made by governments and people of the affected countries with major international support. Major progress has been achieved in the implementation of preventive programmes by universal salt iodination. In spite of this progress, programmes might be fragile and vulnerable due to
lack of commitment and vigilance and to political and socio-economic factors. Recommendations: (a = governments, b = agencies, c = ACC/SCN)
|